<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: LPC15xx in smaller than QFP packages ? in LPC Microcontrollers</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/LPC15xx-in-smaller-than-QFP-packages/m-p/514209#M576</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by IanB on Thu Dec 17 13:43:45 MST 2015&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Agreed - HVQFN33 would be nice.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For the LPC13 parts, TSSOP would also be handy - it would be good to have the Cortex M3 instruction set in a small package.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;TSSOP makes it easy to wire it up on a single sided board. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Not so important with the LPC15 as it has the switch matrix, and you can put most inputs and output where you want them.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-15T17:11:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LPC15xx in smaller than QFP packages ?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/LPC15xx-in-smaller-than-QFP-packages/m-p/514208#M575</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by cgroen on Thu Dec 17 04:59:44 MST 2015&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but trying anyway ;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Are there any plans for releasing LPC15xx devices in smaller packages than the QFP packages (which are mighty big) ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:10:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/LPC15xx-in-smaller-than-QFP-packages/m-p/514208#M575</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T17:10:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LPC15xx in smaller than QFP packages ?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/LPC15xx-in-smaller-than-QFP-packages/m-p/514209#M576</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by IanB on Thu Dec 17 13:43:45 MST 2015&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Agreed - HVQFN33 would be nice.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For the LPC13 parts, TSSOP would also be handy - it would be good to have the Cortex M3 instruction set in a small package.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;TSSOP makes it easy to wire it up on a single sided board. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Not so important with the LPC15 as it has the switch matrix, and you can put most inputs and output where you want them.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/LPC15xx-in-smaller-than-QFP-packages/m-p/514209#M576</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T17:11:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

