<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: lpc55s69 eval board (device rev 1B), adding clkout at 1 MHz changes adc mid range reading of 0.7 in LPC Microcontrollers</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/lpc55s69-eval-board-device-rev-1B-adding-clkout-at-1-MHz-changes/m-p/1550923#M50656</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/206793"&gt;@EinHexenMeister&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There may be noise to ADC , have a look at:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.nxp.com.cn/docs/en/supporting-information/TN00009.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.nxp.com.cn/docs/en/supporting-information/TN00009.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BR&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Alice&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 09:04:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alice_Yang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-11-09T09:04:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>lpc55s69 eval board (device rev 1B), adding clkout at 1 MHz changes adc mid range reading of 0.73 %</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/lpc55s69-eval-board-device-rev-1B-adding-clkout-at-1-MHz-changes/m-p/1545733#M50539</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;using "MCUXpresso IDE v11.6.0 [Build 8187] [2022-07-13]" and "SDK_2_12_0_LPCXpresso55S69" with SDK-lpcxpresso55s69_lpadc_interrupt example code&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i implemented the lpcxpresso55s69_lpadc_interrupt example code into my project and noticed a 0.73 % (full scale err) adc reading error at 1.650 V input on cha-0. the unaltered SDK example raw reading was 2080 versus 2110 with running my code. since my code was written in C++ and had several other peripherals already included it took me quite a while to track the problem down.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;bottom line is to take the unaltered SDK-lpcxpresso55s69_lpadc_interrupt example code, add PIO1_27 with CLKOUT i/o settings to the pinmux.c file and add "kCLOCK_DivClkOut=150" as well as attach "MAIN_CLK_to_CLKOUT" to clock_config.c to make the error reproducible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;changing the clkout frequency to 10 MHz does not really cause any major changes to the adc reading error. i also changed the adc calibration settins to "#define DEMO_LPADC_DO_OFFSET_CALIBRATION true"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now the question is, is this behavior legit or can it be seen as a bug or whatever one want's to call it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 17:43:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/lpc55s69-eval-board-device-rev-1B-adding-clkout-at-1-MHz-changes/m-p/1545733#M50539</guid>
      <dc:creator>EinHexenMeister</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-28T17:43:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lpc55s69 eval board (device rev 1B), adding clkout at 1 MHz changes adc mid range reading of 0.7</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/lpc55s69-eval-board-device-rev-1B-adding-clkout-at-1-MHz-changes/m-p/1546120#M50554</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you meaning every measurement is about 1.650V error?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If yes,&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;the normal method is to get a offset value by using "0"v, than in each convert, deduct the offset, then will get the most accurate result.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Because the demo board is not design dedicated to demo ADC performance, it doesn't take some strict design rules for ADC circuit.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;BF&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Alice&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 06:38:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/lpc55s69-eval-board-device-rev-1B-adding-clkout-at-1-MHz-changes/m-p/1546120#M50554</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alice_Yang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-31T06:38:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lpc55s69 eval board (device rev 1B), adding clkout at 1 MHz changes adc mid range reading of 0.7</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/lpc55s69-eval-board-device-rev-1B-adding-clkout-at-1-MHz-changes/m-p/1547353#M50599</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;correct reading without 1 MHz setting on CLKOUT not routed to PIO1_27.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;step one : connect 1.65 V to adc input channel 0&lt;BR /&gt;step two : adc readings will fluctuate a little but in average it will produce a raw count of 2080 (theoretically expected 2048)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NOW connect internally 1 MHz to CLKOUT routed to PIO1_27.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NO OTHER SETUP CHANGES&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;step three : adc readings will fluctuate a little but in average it will produce NOW a raw count of 2110 (previously 2080)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;reading 2080 "WITHOUT" internally connecting 1MHz CLKOUT to PIO1_27.&lt;BR /&gt;reading 2110 "&amp;nbsp; WITH&amp;nbsp; " internally connecting 1MHz CLKOUT to PIO1_27.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in my opinion internally connecting 1 MHz to CLKOUT and routing it to PIO1_27 should not cause the adc reading to jump from 2080 to 2110 when a mid range voltage of 1.650 V is applied to adc channel 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;how can, or should, an adc unrelated digital setup change (i.e. enabling the CLKOUT signal) within the mpu cause the data output reading of a calibrated adc to change by a count of 30 = 0.73 % full scale&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 03:18:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/lpc55s69-eval-board-device-rev-1B-adding-clkout-at-1-MHz-changes/m-p/1547353#M50599</guid>
      <dc:creator>EinHexenMeister</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-02T03:18:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lpc55s69 eval board (device rev 1B), adding clkout at 1 MHz changes adc mid range reading of 0.7</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/lpc55s69-eval-board-device-rev-1B-adding-clkout-at-1-MHz-changes/m-p/1550923#M50656</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/206793"&gt;@EinHexenMeister&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There may be noise to ADC , have a look at:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.nxp.com.cn/docs/en/supporting-information/TN00009.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.nxp.com.cn/docs/en/supporting-information/TN00009.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BR&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Alice&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 09:04:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/lpc55s69-eval-board-device-rev-1B-adding-clkout-at-1-MHz-changes/m-p/1550923#M50656</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alice_Yang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-09T09:04:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

