<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LPC MicrocontrollersのトピックDecision on choosing crystal alongside PLL</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Decision-on-choosing-crystal-alongside-PLL/m-p/520843#M3843</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by mohammadyou on Sun Oct 25 05:29:27 MST 2015&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have been told for noisy environments having smaller value of external crystal is better and base on the user manual that says "A smaller value of the PLL N as well as smaller value of M Both result in better PLL operational stability and lower jitter "&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;now consider these situations :&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1- 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Mhz crystal Fcco=300Mhz&amp;nbsp; Cpu(core)=100Mhz -&amp;gt; M=150 N=1 CPU div =3 &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2- 10 Mhz crystal Fcco=300Mhz&amp;nbsp; Cpu(core)=100Mhz -&amp;gt; M=15&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; N=1 CPU div =3&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Which configuration do you recommend. Having smaller M and N value or smaller crystal for EMC ? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;lower value of Fcco result in lower power dissipation so should I always try to keep it low and it is the best configuration ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:45:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-15T17:45:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Decision on choosing crystal alongside PLL</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Decision-on-choosing-crystal-alongside-PLL/m-p/520843#M3843</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by mohammadyou on Sun Oct 25 05:29:27 MST 2015&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have been told for noisy environments having smaller value of external crystal is better and base on the user manual that says "A smaller value of the PLL N as well as smaller value of M Both result in better PLL operational stability and lower jitter "&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;now consider these situations :&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1- 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Mhz crystal Fcco=300Mhz&amp;nbsp; Cpu(core)=100Mhz -&amp;gt; M=150 N=1 CPU div =3 &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2- 10 Mhz crystal Fcco=300Mhz&amp;nbsp; Cpu(core)=100Mhz -&amp;gt; M=15&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; N=1 CPU div =3&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Which configuration do you recommend. Having smaller M and N value or smaller crystal for EMC ? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;lower value of Fcco result in lower power dissipation so should I always try to keep it low and it is the best configuration ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:45:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Decision-on-choosing-crystal-alongside-PLL/m-p/520843#M3843</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T17:45:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Decision on choosing crystal alongside PLL</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Decision-on-choosing-crystal-alongside-PLL/m-p/520844#M3844</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by MikeSimmonds on Sun Oct 25 07:43:53 MST 2015&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I think the data sheet gives additional constraints on the range of (external) crystal speed.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Also in the UM there is a max for the intermediate frequency such that some M for a given&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;external crystal are too high.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I did an excel spread sheet for the 1778; there are probably similar for the 1768/1769 if&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;you do a forum search.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;EDIT: Also, if you want (or will want) USB, 12MHz is probably a popular choice.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Mike.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:45:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Decision-on-choosing-crystal-alongside-PLL/m-p/520844#M3844</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T17:45:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Decision on choosing crystal alongside PLL</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Decision-on-choosing-crystal-alongside-PLL/m-p/520845#M3845</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by mohammadyou on Sun Oct 25 08:52:46 MST 2015&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks Mike I did calculate those situation by the excel sheet that the site provided for LPC17xx PLL calculation. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;the max main oscillator operation is from 1Mhz to 25Mhz. (the constraint on the range of external crystal).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I checked and select all parameters in the range and both of them work correctly. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I want to know which one of them is better in term of noise, jitter? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:45:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Decision-on-choosing-crystal-alongside-PLL/m-p/520845#M3845</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T17:45:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Decision on choosing crystal alongside PLL</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Decision-on-choosing-crystal-alongside-PLL/m-p/520846#M3846</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by wmues on Mon Oct 26 02:48:11 MST 2015&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Using a 12MHz Crystal will give you the best compatibility regarding booting/flashing.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Use a crystal with a low load capacitance. This will lead to low capacitors on the crystal, and this will demand less current from the oscillator. I use a load capacitance of 13pF, which will result in 18pF capacitors. Low power oscillators are more reliable with a crystal with low load capacitance.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:45:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Decision-on-choosing-crystal-alongside-PLL/m-p/520846#M3846</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T17:45:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Decision on choosing crystal alongside PLL</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Decision-on-choosing-crystal-alongside-PLL/m-p/520847#M3847</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by mohammadyou on Tue Oct 27 07:31:29 MST 2015&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks guys&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:45:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Decision-on-choosing-crystal-alongside-PLL/m-p/520847#M3847</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T17:45:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

