<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: LPC546xx fixed RAM address 0x2001000 for CAN in LPC Microcontrollers</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/LPC546xx-fixed-RAM-address-0x2001000-for-CAN/m-p/878306#M35128</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daniel,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;have a look here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/message/964791"&gt;https://community.nxp.com/message/964791&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 13:21:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>carstengroen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-01T13:21:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LPC546xx fixed RAM address 0x2001000 for CAN</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/LPC546xx-fixed-RAM-address-0x2001000-for-CAN/m-p/878305#M35127</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are using the CAN interface on the LPC54628. We also use&amp;nbsp;the fsl_can.c/h driver provided with the MCUXpresso SDK 2.5.0. In the two examples provided in the SDK:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- boards\lpcxpresso54628\driver_examples\mcan\interrupt_transfer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- boards\lpcxpresso54628\driver_examples\mcan\loopback\&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the fsl_mcan.c function MCAN_SetMsgRAMBase() is called with the MSG_RAM_BASE address fixed to 0x20010000 i.e. beginning of SRAM1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We tried to move this base address to beginning of SRAM2 i.e. MSG_RAM_BASE = 0x20018000. With this modification the example does not work. Why?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a limitation where the base RAM address can be placed to the CAN driver?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Where is this limitation described?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dani&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 09:18:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/LPC546xx-fixed-RAM-address-0x2001000-for-CAN/m-p/878305#M35127</guid>
      <dc:creator>danielgull</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-01T09:18:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LPC546xx fixed RAM address 0x2001000 for CAN</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/LPC546xx-fixed-RAM-address-0x2001000-for-CAN/m-p/878306#M35128</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daniel,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;have a look here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/message/964791"&gt;https://community.nxp.com/message/964791&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 13:21:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/LPC546xx-fixed-RAM-address-0x2001000-for-CAN/m-p/878306#M35128</guid>
      <dc:creator>carstengroen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-01T13:21:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

