<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LPC MicrocontrollersのトピックRe: Unstable RAM access after changing speed to 204MHz</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Unstable-RAM-access-after-changing-speed-to-204MHz/m-p/561976#M16382</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by larsjep on Wed Apr 03 02:10:38 MST 2013&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Please notice that LPC43xx has a problem with the EMC clock divider.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When the clock divider is enabled the duty cycle of the EMC clock is not 50%&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This can result in problems with the required setup times of the address signals.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; Lars&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:47:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-15T18:47:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unstable RAM access after changing speed to 204MHz</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Unstable-RAM-access-after-changing-speed-to-204MHz/m-p/561974#M16380</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by Jon Reece on Wed Mar 27 02:36:30 MST 2013&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am using an EA OEM board for an application and I am trying to increase the speed of the processor to reduce the processing time. I have successfully changed the clock speed in steps following the BlickFast example. When I query the clock speed I now get 204000000 as expected. However, when I try and access the SDRAM the processor will disconnect from the debugger and I cannot stop/reprogram it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Do you have an example of setting up the SDRAM peripheral to work at 102MHz with a core clock of 204MHz? The ISSI RAM chip that we are using, IS42S32800D-6BLI, should support bus speeds of upto 166MHz so I don't believe that 102MHz should be a problem. I am using the NS2CLK function to get the register timing values which implies that I should be able to change the clock speed and the ram *should* (as I understand it) work.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you need any more information please let me know,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Jon&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:47:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Unstable-RAM-access-after-changing-speed-to-204MHz/m-p/561974#M16380</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T18:47:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unstable RAM access after changing speed to 204MHz</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Unstable-RAM-access-after-changing-speed-to-204MHz/m-p/561975#M16381</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by suckfish on Mon Apr 01 15:59:30 MST 2013&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Everything locking up when you access SDRAM could well be a clocking problem.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Check that you have all 4 EMC clock outs going to the pins, and that you have the *input* buffers enabled on those pins also.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[It's counter-intuitive that you need all 4, and that you need them as inputs also, but yes you do.&amp;nbsp; Presumably the EMC is using the inputs as feedback to adjust timing.]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:47:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Unstable-RAM-access-after-changing-speed-to-204MHz/m-p/561975#M16381</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T18:47:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unstable RAM access after changing speed to 204MHz</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Unstable-RAM-access-after-changing-speed-to-204MHz/m-p/561976#M16382</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by larsjep on Wed Apr 03 02:10:38 MST 2013&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Please notice that LPC43xx has a problem with the EMC clock divider.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When the clock divider is enabled the duty cycle of the EMC clock is not 50%&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This can result in problems with the required setup times of the address signals.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; Lars&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:47:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Unstable-RAM-access-after-changing-speed-to-204MHz/m-p/561976#M16382</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T18:47:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unstable RAM access after changing speed to 204MHz</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Unstable-RAM-access-after-changing-speed-to-204MHz/m-p/561977#M16383</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by hlsa on Fri Apr 19 02:36:55 MST 2013&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a known problem of the EA-Board. I have already addressed this issue to EA in february and they confirmed the problem. As far as I know, there is still no solution (what a shame for EA). SDRAM works here only up to 144 MHz.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the meantime I bought an evaluation board from Keil (MCB4357) and I do have my own hardware. On both of the SDRAM works fine.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Holger&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:47:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Unstable-RAM-access-after-changing-speed-to-204MHz/m-p/561977#M16383</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T18:47:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

