Kinetis Microcontrollers中的主题 Re: Using FTM compare

Using FTM compare

mauriziospagni — Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:00:06 GMT

I want to use one timer (FTM2 in my case) of a MKE02Z32VLC2 to set a flag after a specified time. In this case, just for testing, it's fixed at 10000 timer steps but in practice it will be variable.

The standard procedure, used thousand of times in other projects with many other processors, is replicated in this processor as follows:

FTM2_C0SC = FTM_CnSC_MSA_MASK; // MS = 0:1 (compare), ELS = 0:0, interrupt disabled

FTM2_SC = FTM_SC_CLKS(1) | FTM_SC_PS(6); // System clock, prescaler 64

while (1)

{

// Output pin Toggle

FTM2_C0V = FTM2_CNT + 10000; // Set the compare value

FTM2_C0SC &= ~FTM_CnSC_CHF_MASK; // Reset of the event flag

do {} while ((FTM2_C0SC & FTM_CnSC_CHF_MASK) == 0); // Wait for the compare event

}

But in this case it doesn't work. I see the output toggling every timer rollover. It seems that FTM2_C0V is not set.

I know that FTM2_C0V is really updated only after the timer has advanced one step, but here it seems it's simply ignored.

By the way: the timer clock is much slower than the CPU clock.

I was unable to find any example on the 'net.

Any idea?

Re: Using FTM compare

Robin_Shen — Wed, 18 Sep 2019 02:24:03 GMT

Hi Maurizio Spagni,

It seems that you only need the timer set a flag after a specified time, don't need one pin output waveform.
Then I recommend you use PIT instead of use FTM Output Compare mode.

Best Regards,

Robin

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Using FTM compare

mauriziospagni — Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:32:35 GMT

Hi Robin,

Robin_Shen wrote:
It seems that you only need the timer set a flag after a specified time, don't need one pin output waveform.

Yes, right that, but the thing is absolutely a-periodical.

I mean: sometime in the program execution I neet to know when some time has passed, so I set the compare at (current time + delay) (i.e. FTM2_C0V = FTM2_CNT + delta) then the program does something else and, synchronously, periodically polls the event flag (FTM_CnSC_CHF).

That's common practice since the times of Motorola HC08.

And the thing doesn't change even if I use the interrupts.

My question is more specifically addressed on: why the FTM behaves in this odd mode? What I overlooked?

Regards

Maurizio

Re: Using FTM compare

mauriziospagni — Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:44:21 GMT

This works:

FTM2_C0SC = FTM_CnSC_MSA_MASK; // MS = 0:1 (compare), ELS = 0:0, interrupt disabled

FTM2_SC = FTM_SC_CLKS(1) | FTM_SC_PS(6); // System clock, prescaler 64

while (1)

{

uint32_t foo;

// Output pin Toggle

foo = FTM2_CNT;

FTM2_C0V = foo + 10000; // Set the compare value

do {} while (foo == FTM2_CNT); // Wait for the actual loading of FTM2_C0V

FTM2_C0SC &= ~FTM_CnSC_CHF_MASK; // Reset of the event flag

do {} while ((FTM2_C0SC & FTM_CnSC_CHF_MASK) == 0); // Wait for the compare event

}

but it's absurd I need to waste time waiting for FTM2_C0V to be loaded.

Re: Using FTM compare

mauriziospagni — Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:43:18 GMT

It seems that I'm not alone!

The problem was already met here.

I missed that post when I browsed the community because I was looking for "compare".

Anyway, as far as I understand, the problem was not solved.

N.B. A slightly better (but still completely unsatisfactory) way to make it work is as follow:

while (1)

{

uint16_t foo;

// Output pin Toggle

foo = FTM2_CNT + 10000;

FTM2_C0V = foo; // Set the compare value

do {} while (FTM2_C0V != foo); // Wait for the actual loading of FTM2_C0V

FTM2_C0SC &= ~FTM_CnSC_CHF_MASK; // Reset of the event flag

do {} while ((FTM2_C0SC & FTM_CnSC_CHF_MASK) == 0); // Wait for the compare event

}

Re: Using FTM compare

Robin_Shen — Thu, 19 Sep 2019 06:46:42 GMT

Since the thing is absolutely a-periodical, would you please try:

first

FTM2_C0V = 10000;

then

FTM2_SC |= FTM_SC_CLKS(1);

Re: Using FTM compare

mauriziospagni — Thu, 19 Sep 2019 07:16:08 GMT

In a nutshell: stop the timer when updating FTM2_C0V.

In my case:

void SetShortTimeout(uint16_t us)
{
FTM2_SC = FTM_SC_CLKS(0) | FTM_SC_PS(6); // Stop the timer
FTM2_C0V = FTM2_CNT + us; // New compare value
FTM2_C0SC &= ~FTM_CnSC_CHF_MASK; // Reset of the event flag
FTM2_SC = FTM_SC_CLKS(1) | FTM_SC_PS(6); // Restart the timer
}

Good workaround... perfect for me and in this case. Thank you very much.

But this operation disturbs the main counter, i.e. all the 8 channels!

How awful...