Kinetis Drivers - fsl_flash versus fsl_ftfx_flash

deniscollis — Fri, 19 Apr 2019 23:33:57 GMT

I see that some of the demos and/or examples use the fsl_flash driver, and others use the fsl_ftfx_flash driiver. At first glance the APIs look the same. However, the underlying code is different. For example, fsl_flash has a mechanism to copy and execute the driver functions from RAM, which is not present in fsl_ftfx_flash.

Which is preferred?

Re: Kinetis Drivers - fsl_flash versus fsl_ftfx_flash

kerryzhou — Mon, 22 Apr 2019 05:29:56 GMT

Hi Denis Collis,

fsl_ftfx also copy the run command to ram, please check this code:

When you use the flash, please copy the launch command code to RAM.

Wish it helps you!

Have a great day,
Kerry

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!

- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored
Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

topic Kinetis Drivers - fsl_flash versus fsl_ftfx_flash in Kinetis Microcontrollers

Kinetis Drivers - fsl_flash versus fsl_ftfx_flash

Re: Kinetis Drivers - fsl_flash versus fsl_ftfx_flash