Kinetis MicrocontrollersのトピックCAN 2.0 vs SAE J1939 https://community.nxp.com/t5/Kinetis-Microcontrollers/CAN-2-0-vs-SAE-J1939/m-p/619469#M37005 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>I am using S12 to implement the CAN communication protocol. We would mainly use CAN 2.0.</P><P></P><P>In the datasheet, It mentions that S12 can support CAN 2.0. May I know can S12 support SAE J1939? As I know CAN 2.0 and SAE J1939 has the similar extended header frame. Are they compatible?</P><P></P><P>Thank you.</P></BODY></HTML> Tue, 01 Nov 2016 02:51:22 GMT monstor 2016-11-01T02:51:22Z CAN 2.0 vs SAE J1939 https://community.nxp.com/t5/Kinetis-Microcontrollers/CAN-2-0-vs-SAE-J1939/m-p/619469#M37005 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>I am using S12 to implement the CAN communication protocol. We would mainly use CAN 2.0.</P><P></P><P>In the datasheet, It mentions that S12 can support CAN 2.0. May I know can S12 support SAE J1939? As I know CAN 2.0 and SAE J1939 has the similar extended header frame. Are they compatible?</P><P></P><P>Thank you.</P></BODY></HTML> Tue, 01 Nov 2016 02:51:22 GMT https://community.nxp.com/t5/Kinetis-Microcontrollers/CAN-2-0-vs-SAE-J1939/m-p/619469#M37005 monstor 2016-11-01T02:51:22Z Re: CAN 2.0 vs SAE J1939 https://community.nxp.com/t5/Kinetis-Microcontrollers/CAN-2-0-vs-SAE-J1939/m-p/619470#M37006 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>The short answer is 'yes', these CAN 2.0 peripherals are EXACTLY what you need for J1939.&nbsp; The way J1939 uses the full-size CAN 2.0 ID just means you have to run the receiver in 'promiscuous mode' and do all traffic filtering in firmware.</P><P></P><P>The longer answer is 'go to Simma Software' for a full high-performance J1939 stack, already guaranteed to run on that uP.</P></BODY></HTML> Thu, 03 Nov 2016 00:59:12 GMT https://community.nxp.com/t5/Kinetis-Microcontrollers/CAN-2-0-vs-SAE-J1939/m-p/619470#M37006 egoodii 2016-11-03T00:59:12Z