Kinetis MicrocontrollersのトピックRe: TRK-KEA128 FTM

TRK-KEA128 FTM

Robinwithu — Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:21:56 GMT

Hi ,

please can anybody see my code and tell me why "timer_.cnt" variable is not incrementing in my code?? the code is never coming out of "while(timer_.cnt < tmp_timer)" loop.

in my code i defined some Timer variables in STRACTURE form, assigning them defined values and comparing with the Flex Timer actual values and toggling the pins of PORTC0 and PORTC1

if i am incrementing "timer_.cnt++" in side while loop it's working fine but if i am putting the value of FTM it's not incrementing (I think so).

I tried to debug the code but FTM is FROZEN in Debugging mode :smileysad:

Note : I checked FTM alone working fine and also code till "while(timer_.cnt < tmp_timer)" this loop working fine. (I toggled the PORTC0 and POTC1) pins.

I am working with TRK-KEA128 Board

* main implementation: use this 'C' sample to create your own application

#include "derivative.h" /* include peripheral declarations */

#define PRTC0 0x10000

#define PRTC1 0x20000

#define PRTC2 0x40000

#define PRTC3 0x80000

//brief Zeit dier benötigt wird ein Fail zu löschen

#define FAIL_TIMEOUT (unsigned int) 596 // 6.4µsec x 596 = 3.814 mSec => 2500 * 100

#define FAIL_MIN_TIME (unsigned int) 298 // 6.4µsec x 298 = 1.9 mSec => 10 * 100

#define MIN_OFF_TIME (unsigned int) 7450 // 6.4µsec x 7450 = 47.68 mSec => 500 * 100

#define MIN_OFF_TIME_START_UP (unsigned int) 745 // 6.4µsec x 745 = 4.76 mSec => 50 * 100

#define MIN_PROG_RUN_TIME (unsigned int) 373 // 6.4µsec x 373 = 2.38 mSec => 25 * 100

#define MAX_WAIT_FOR_OFF_TIME (unsigned int) 62500 // 6.4µsec x 62500 = 400 mSec => 5000 * 100

#define FRA_DETECT_CYCLES (unsigned char) 150 // 6.4µsec x 150 = 0.960 mSec

#define RECOVERY_CHECKTIME (unsigned int) 2000 // .05µsec x 2000 x 26 (Loop Cycles) = 2.6 mSec

// Timer Variables

struct _Timer_

{

unsigned int cnt; // Umlaufender Timer, für allgemeines Programmtiming, 100µs Auflösung

unsigned int active; // FRA Timer, zur zeitlichen Steuerung des Wischens, 100µs Auflösung

unsigned int fail_up_cnt; // FAIL up counter

unsigned int fail_down_cnt; // FAIL down counter

unsigned int waitoff; // WAITOFF warte die Mindestoff-Zeit ab

unsigned int Recovery_counter;

};

typedef struct _Timer_ Timer;

static volatile Timer timer_ = { (unsigned int)0, (unsigned int)0, (unsigned int)0, (unsigned int)0, (unsigned int)0,(unsigned int)0};

void delay(unsigned long k);

static void startTimer(void);

void REFRESH_WDT(void);

static void TMR_CNTRL(void);

void main(void)

{

asm("CPSID i"); // Disable Interrupt

unsigned int tmp_uint = 0; // zum kurzigen merken von intergern, zB FraState */

unsigned int tmp_timer = 0; // Zwischenmerker für Zeitmessungen, bei Mindestlaufzeit und warten auf Dunkelphase */

ICS_C1|=ICS_C1_IRCLKEN_MASK; /* Enable the internal reference clock*/

ICS_C3= 0x90; /* Reference clock frequency = 39.0625 KHz*/

while(!(ICS_S & ICS_S_LOCK_MASK)); /* Wait for PLL lock, now running at 40 MHz (1024 * 39.0625Khz) */

ICS_C2|=ICS_C2_BDIV(1) ; /*BDIV=2, Bus clock = 20 MHz*/

ICS_S |= ICS_S_LOCK_MASK ; /* Clear Loss of lock sticky bit */

WDOG_CNT = 0x20C5; // write the 1st unlock word

WDOG_CNT = 0x28D9; // write the 2nd unlock word

// delay(10);

WDOG_TOVALL = 30; // 10 x (1 / 1000) = 10 msec but cause of tolerance it's 16msec (Appx. +25 /-35 %)

WDOG_TOVALH = 0; // Always Write the Value for Cortex Controller in LOW & HIGH Byte

WDOG_CS2 = 0x01; // Select clock 1Khz ; to select 32 Khz clock we need to Enable in ICS_C1 register internal reference clock enable bit ICS_C1[IRCLKEN]

WDOG_CS1 = 0x80; // Enable WDT : Feed the Dog : Activate the Dog

GPIOA_PDDR = 0xF07FE; // GPIO PORTC as Output // Define PortA (A1-A3) all Pin As Output ; one is Output and Zero is Input

// After POR : Power on Reset The Port Pins are in High Impedance State

// GPIOA_PIDR= 0xF07FE; // Define PORTA(A0): As FRA_FAIL input pin : LED STATUS Detection pin

// PORT_PTBIE_PTBIE3= 1; // Define PortB(B3): As FRA_TRIG input Pin : one is Input Enabled and Zero is Input Disabled

GPIOA_PDOR = 0x00000; // Initialise the PORTA, PORTB

timer_.cnt = 0; // Initialise all Timer Variables

timer_.active = 0;

timer_.fail_down_cnt = 0;

timer_.fail_up_cnt = 0;

timer_.waitoff = 0;

timer_.Recovery_counter=0;

startTimer();

tmp_timer = MIN_PROG_RUN_TIME; // Min PROGRAM run time is 2.5 mSec

TMR_CNTRL();

tmp_timer += timer_.cnt;

while(timer_.cnt < tmp_timer)

{

TMR_CNTRL();

// timer_.cnt++;

}

for(;;){

GPIOA_PSOR = PRTC0;

GPIOA_PSOR = PRTC1;

}

static void TMR_CNTRL(void)

{

unsigned int x =0;

x = FTM0_CNT ; // Initialise FTM0 Counter

FTM0_CNT = FTM0_CNT - x; // Reset Counter

timer_.cnt = timer_.cnt + x; // Increment Counter

if(timer_.active)

{

if((timer_.active + x) < (unsigned int)0xFFFF) // If Active counter is less than 0XFFFF ,increment timer.active

{

timer_.active = timer_.active + x;

}

if((timer_.waitoff - x) > 0) // If Waitoff Counter is greater than Zero , Decrement the Waitoff Counter

{

timer_.waitoff = timer_.waitoff - x;

}

static void startTimer(void)

{

SIM_SCGC |= SIM_SCGC_FTM0_MASK; // Enable the clock to the FTM0 module;

FTM0_CNT = 0x0000;

FTM0_MOD = 0xFFFF; // The FTM Counter is Free Running Counter by Defining MODH:L=0x0000 or MODH:L=0xFFFF;

FTM0_SC = 0x0F; // CPWMS=0; Counter Mode;System Clock (Default) 20Mhz, FEI mode Default, Prescaler Factor 1:128

}

void REFRESH_WDT(void)

{

// DisableInterrupts; // Refreshing the Watchdog

delay(5); // small Delay before writing refresh word

WDOG_CNT = 0x02A6; // write the 1st refresh word

WDOG_CNT = 0x80B4; //write the 2nd refresh word to refresh counter

}

void delay(unsigned long k)

{

unsigned long delay ;

for (delay=0;delay<k;delay++) ;

}

Thanks and Kind Regards,

Robin

Re: TRK-KEA128 FTM

mjbcswitzerland — Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:38:04 GMT

Robin

If the following is called quickly (faster than the FTM increments)

x = FTM0_CNT ; // Initialise FTM0 Counter

FTM0_CNT = FTM0_CNT - x; // Reset Counter

timer_.cnt = timer_.cnt + x; // Increment Counter

x will always be zero and so your variable timer_.cnt will always remain at the same value.

Regards

Mark

Kinetis: µTasker Kinetis support

KE: µTasker FRDM-KE02Z support / µTasker FRDM-KE02Z40M support / µTasker FRDM-KE06Z support

For the complete "out-of-the-box" Kinetis experience and faster time to market

Re: TRK-KEA128 FTM

Robinwithu — Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:20:17 GMT

Hello Mark,

I put delay in my while loop as below

while(timer_.cnt < tmp_timer)

{

delay(10000);

TMR_CNTRL();

// timer_.cnt++;

}

Timer is running at 20Mhz , with Prescaler 128 so increment time should not be more than 1/20Mhz X 128 = 6.4 µSec , delay is also at 20Mhz so 1/20Mhz X 10000 = 500 µsec, I think so in this case counter should increment

but i am getting the same result :smileysad:

Thanks.

MFG

Robin

Re: TRK-KEA128 FTM

Robinwithu — Mon, 13 Apr 2015 12:08:44 GMT

Hello Mark,

I noticed very strange thing , i just changed the Code Optimization from -Os to Code Optimization to None(-O0) and the code is working fine only with delay(25) in while loop as you said. I did setting Code Optimization from None to -Os cause i got really a big code size and after compile i got error for "text_m" bigger in size than allocated memory, SO i read on freescale Forum and changed the Code optimization setting from none to -Os :smileysad: .The above code is just part of that so that their is no Text_m error .

please can you help what's Code Optimization exactly doing and what should be the Ideal setting for Code Optimization :smileysad:?

Thanks

MFG

Robin

Re: TRK-KEA128 FTM

bobpaddock — Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:15:48 GMT

" -Os to Code Optimization to None(-O0) and the code is working fine only with delay(25)"

When -O0 works and others don't this is almost always a case of a volatile being missing someplace it is needed.

Also try -O2. I've run into some obscure corner cases where -Os creates code with alignment issues for ARM parts.

Re: TRK-KEA128 FTM

Robinwithu — Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:55:29 GMT

Hello Bob,

Thanks for Reply , i tried with every available settings for Optimization but it is working only with -O0 Optimization Only :smileysad: i.e none optimization.

Thanks

MFG

Robin