<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Kinetis MicrocontrollersのトピックK64 Low Power Mode Comparisons</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Kinetis-Microcontrollers/K64-Low-Power-Mode-Comparisons/m-p/338636#M16238</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using the FRDM-K64F board it is easy to perform current consumption measurements in various processor operating modes. Since the range of values is quite large it makes an interesting comparison too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The binary for performing the test can be loaded from &lt;A href="http://www.utasker.com/kinetis/FRDM-K64F.html" title="http://www.utasker.com/kinetis/FRDM-K64F.html"&gt;http://www.utasker.com/kinetis/FRDM-K64F.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and there is some information about the LLWU wakeup inputs used at &lt;A href="http://www.utasker.com/kinetis/LLWU.html" title="http://www.utasker.com/kinetis/LLWU.html"&gt;µTasker LLWU Support&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The results are as follows (at 120MHz whenever running - RTC always operating)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- &lt;STRONG&gt;RUN&lt;/STRONG&gt; mode (processor never uses and low power modes) &lt;STRONG&gt;50mA&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- &lt;STRONG&gt;WAIT&lt;/STRONG&gt; mode (uses WAIT whenever there is nothing else to do) &lt;STRONG&gt;27mA&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- &lt;STRONG&gt;STOP&lt;/STRONG&gt; mode (uses STOP mode whenever there is nothing else to do but doesn't stop the PLL) &lt;STRONG&gt;3.3mA&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- &lt;STRONG&gt;VLPS&lt;/STRONG&gt; mode (uses very low power stop whenever there is nothing to do but wakes up on timer or UART events) around &lt;STRONG&gt;300uA&lt;/STRONG&gt; (with peaks during short running phases)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- &lt;STRONG&gt;LLS&lt;/STRONG&gt; (moves to low-leakage power mode and waits for a switch to be pressed) &lt;STRONG&gt;270uA&lt;/STRONG&gt; - [SW2 temporarily wakes frrm the mode to print a message and then falls back to LLS / SW3 causes the sytem to move to the WAIT operation again ]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- &lt;STRONG&gt;VLLS0&lt;/STRONG&gt; (moves to very low-leakage 0 mode and waits for a reset to restart operation) - &lt;STRONG&gt;116uA&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- &lt;STRONG&gt;VLLS1&lt;/STRONG&gt; (moves to very low-leakage 0 mode and waits for a reset to restart operation) - &lt;STRONG&gt;270uA&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- &lt;STRONG&gt;VLLS2&lt;/STRONG&gt; (moves to very low-leakage 0 mode and waits for a reset to restart operation) - &lt;STRONG&gt;270uA&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- &lt;STRONG&gt;VLLS3&lt;/STRONG&gt; (moves to very low-leakage 0 mode and waits for a reset to restart operation) - &lt;STRONG&gt;124uA&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My multimeter has problems with measuring in the uA range when there are short high peaks during the regular RUN period in VLPS so that value is not particulary accurate (guestimation).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I haven't analyed to be sure that the VLLSx modes are really correct or as expected but the results may prove of interest as rough comparison/starting point - also for other devices which should be able to achieve much lower values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mark&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.utasker.com/kinetis.html" title="http://www.utasker.com/kinetis.html"&gt;http://www.utasker.com/kinetis.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 04:40:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mjbcswitzerland</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-01-13T04:40:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>K64 Low Power Mode Comparisons</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Kinetis-Microcontrollers/K64-Low-Power-Mode-Comparisons/m-p/338636#M16238</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using the FRDM-K64F board it is easy to perform current consumption measurements in various processor operating modes. Since the range of values is quite large it makes an interesting comparison too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The binary for performing the test can be loaded from &lt;A href="http://www.utasker.com/kinetis/FRDM-K64F.html" title="http://www.utasker.com/kinetis/FRDM-K64F.html"&gt;http://www.utasker.com/kinetis/FRDM-K64F.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and there is some information about the LLWU wakeup inputs used at &lt;A href="http://www.utasker.com/kinetis/LLWU.html" title="http://www.utasker.com/kinetis/LLWU.html"&gt;µTasker LLWU Support&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The results are as follows (at 120MHz whenever running - RTC always operating)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- &lt;STRONG&gt;RUN&lt;/STRONG&gt; mode (processor never uses and low power modes) &lt;STRONG&gt;50mA&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- &lt;STRONG&gt;WAIT&lt;/STRONG&gt; mode (uses WAIT whenever there is nothing else to do) &lt;STRONG&gt;27mA&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- &lt;STRONG&gt;STOP&lt;/STRONG&gt; mode (uses STOP mode whenever there is nothing else to do but doesn't stop the PLL) &lt;STRONG&gt;3.3mA&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- &lt;STRONG&gt;VLPS&lt;/STRONG&gt; mode (uses very low power stop whenever there is nothing to do but wakes up on timer or UART events) around &lt;STRONG&gt;300uA&lt;/STRONG&gt; (with peaks during short running phases)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- &lt;STRONG&gt;LLS&lt;/STRONG&gt; (moves to low-leakage power mode and waits for a switch to be pressed) &lt;STRONG&gt;270uA&lt;/STRONG&gt; - [SW2 temporarily wakes frrm the mode to print a message and then falls back to LLS / SW3 causes the sytem to move to the WAIT operation again ]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- &lt;STRONG&gt;VLLS0&lt;/STRONG&gt; (moves to very low-leakage 0 mode and waits for a reset to restart operation) - &lt;STRONG&gt;116uA&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- &lt;STRONG&gt;VLLS1&lt;/STRONG&gt; (moves to very low-leakage 0 mode and waits for a reset to restart operation) - &lt;STRONG&gt;270uA&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- &lt;STRONG&gt;VLLS2&lt;/STRONG&gt; (moves to very low-leakage 0 mode and waits for a reset to restart operation) - &lt;STRONG&gt;270uA&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- &lt;STRONG&gt;VLLS3&lt;/STRONG&gt; (moves to very low-leakage 0 mode and waits for a reset to restart operation) - &lt;STRONG&gt;124uA&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My multimeter has problems with measuring in the uA range when there are short high peaks during the regular RUN period in VLPS so that value is not particulary accurate (guestimation).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I haven't analyed to be sure that the VLLSx modes are really correct or as expected but the results may prove of interest as rough comparison/starting point - also for other devices which should be able to achieve much lower values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mark&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.utasker.com/kinetis.html" title="http://www.utasker.com/kinetis.html"&gt;http://www.utasker.com/kinetis.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 04:40:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Kinetis-Microcontrollers/K64-Low-Power-Mode-Comparisons/m-p/338636#M16238</guid>
      <dc:creator>mjbcswitzerland</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-13T04:40:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

