<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Setting kCLOCK_PllVideo in SDK_25_12_00_EVK-MIMXRT1064 fsl_clock.c in i.MX RT Crossover MCUs</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-RT-Crossover-MCUs/Setting-kCLOCK-PllVideo-in-SDK-25-12-00-EVK-MIMXRT1064-fsl-clock/m-p/2327381#M36306</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Here is the code from fsl_clock.c line 1072~1080. SDK version is 25_12_00.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;case kCLOCK_PllVideo:&lt;BR /&gt;/* PLL output frequency = Fref * (DIV_SELECT + NUM/DENOM). */&lt;BR /&gt;divSelect =&lt;BR /&gt;(CCM_ANALOG-&amp;gt;PLL_VIDEO &amp;amp; CCM_ANALOG_PLL_VIDEO_DIV_SELECT_MASK) &amp;gt;&amp;gt; CCM_ANALOG_PLL_VIDEO_DIV_SELECT_SHIFT;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;freqTmp = ((clock_64b_t)freq * ((clock_64b_t)(CCM_ANALOG-&amp;gt;PLL_VIDEO_NUM)));&lt;BR /&gt;freqTmp /= ((clock_64b_t)(CCM_ANALOG-&amp;gt;PLL_VIDEO_DENOM));&lt;BR /&gt;freq = freq * divSelect + (uint32_t)freqTmp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The last line should be freq = freq * (divSelect + (uint32_t)freqTmp); ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this potential bug? Also, when CCM_ANALOG-&amp;gt;PLL_VIDEO_DENOM is 0, this does not handle DIV 0 fault.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 22:48:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>choix361</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-03-05T22:48:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Setting kCLOCK_PllVideo in SDK_25_12_00_EVK-MIMXRT1064 fsl_clock.c</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-RT-Crossover-MCUs/Setting-kCLOCK-PllVideo-in-SDK-25-12-00-EVK-MIMXRT1064-fsl-clock/m-p/2327381#M36306</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here is the code from fsl_clock.c line 1072~1080. SDK version is 25_12_00.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;case kCLOCK_PllVideo:&lt;BR /&gt;/* PLL output frequency = Fref * (DIV_SELECT + NUM/DENOM). */&lt;BR /&gt;divSelect =&lt;BR /&gt;(CCM_ANALOG-&amp;gt;PLL_VIDEO &amp;amp; CCM_ANALOG_PLL_VIDEO_DIV_SELECT_MASK) &amp;gt;&amp;gt; CCM_ANALOG_PLL_VIDEO_DIV_SELECT_SHIFT;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;freqTmp = ((clock_64b_t)freq * ((clock_64b_t)(CCM_ANALOG-&amp;gt;PLL_VIDEO_NUM)));&lt;BR /&gt;freqTmp /= ((clock_64b_t)(CCM_ANALOG-&amp;gt;PLL_VIDEO_DENOM));&lt;BR /&gt;freq = freq * divSelect + (uint32_t)freqTmp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The last line should be freq = freq * (divSelect + (uint32_t)freqTmp); ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this potential bug? Also, when CCM_ANALOG-&amp;gt;PLL_VIDEO_DENOM is 0, this does not handle DIV 0 fault.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 22:48:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-RT-Crossover-MCUs/Setting-kCLOCK-PllVideo-in-SDK-25-12-00-EVK-MIMXRT1064-fsl-clock/m-p/2327381#M36306</guid>
      <dc:creator>choix361</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-05T22:48:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Setting kCLOCK_PllVideo in SDK_25_12_00_EVK-MIMXRT1064 fsl_clock.c</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-RT-Crossover-MCUs/Setting-kCLOCK-PllVideo-in-SDK-25-12-00-EVK-MIMXRT1064-fsl-clock/m-p/2328666#M36326</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/192846"&gt;@choix361&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your interest in NXP MIMXRT series!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The SDK line is correct. freqTmp is already calculated as Fref * (NUM/DENOM), so the final output should be Fref*DIV_SELECT + Fref*(NUM/DENOM), i.e. freq = freq * divSelect + (uint32_t)freqTmp;. Using freq = freq * (divSelect + (uint32_t)freqTmp) would multiply freq twice and give a wrong result.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You are right about the divide-by-zero risk: if PLL_VIDEO_DENOM == 0, the current code would divide by zero and there is no guard in this function. In normal use, DENOM should be programmed to a non-zero value by the PLL init/config, but for extra robustness you can add a simple check (or assert) before the division.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Gavin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 06:49:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-RT-Crossover-MCUs/Setting-kCLOCK-PllVideo-in-SDK-25-12-00-EVK-MIMXRT1064-fsl-clock/m-p/2328666#M36326</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gavin_Jia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-09T06:49:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

