<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: XIP on imx? in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/XIP-on-imx/m-p/192697#M9908</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issue is that almost nobody out there uses it, so you are entering a dead end. Some time ago there was even a discussion to remove the feature from the kernel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What kind of "performance" do you have in mind? CPUs in the MX25 range can be booted from power-good into userspace in about 700 ms.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:22:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RobertSchwebel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-14T16:22:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>XIP on imx?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/XIP-on-imx/m-p/192694#M9905</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone successfully built and run a XIP kernel on an imx part? We can build it with ltib ( hopefully we got it right ), but loading and running haven't been successful ( so maybe using mkImage is bad? Or our uboot command is not right? ).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone have experience with it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Randy Krakora&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:28:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/XIP-on-imx/m-p/192694#M9905</guid>
      <dc:creator>RandyKrakora</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-14T15:28:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XIP on imx?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/XIP-on-imx/m-p/192695#M9906</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why do you want to do XIP? The only usecase for XIP I have seen so far was while running Linux on a very ressource constrained Cortex-M3. On any other device, XIP should not be necessary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Robert&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:08:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/XIP-on-imx/m-p/192695#M9906</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertSchwebel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-14T16:08:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XIP on imx?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/XIP-on-imx/m-p/192696#M9907</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's an experiment to compare performance with and without it ( on imx25 ), just to prove that it may not be a good choice. Sorry we can't just take word that it's a bad idea, we have to see for ourselves. :smileyhappy:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Randy Krakora&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:14:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/XIP-on-imx/m-p/192696#M9907</guid>
      <dc:creator>RandyKrakora</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-14T16:14:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XIP on imx?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/XIP-on-imx/m-p/192697#M9908</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issue is that almost nobody out there uses it, so you are entering a dead end. Some time ago there was even a discussion to remove the feature from the kernel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What kind of "performance" do you have in mind? CPUs in the MX25 range can be booted from power-good into userspace in about 700 ms.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:22:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/XIP-on-imx/m-p/192697#M9908</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertSchwebel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-14T16:22:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XIP on imx?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/XIP-on-imx/m-p/192698#M9909</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's what we've found, there's no clear instructions on how to do it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually I misspoke when I said performance, we are looking at increasing available RAM and XIP is a way to do that, but if the performance with XIP is too bad, obviously we won't keep it enabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Randy Krakora&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:27:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/XIP-on-imx/m-p/192698#M9909</guid>
      <dc:creator>RandyKrakora</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-14T16:27:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

