<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic VDD_HIGH_IN question in Rev. 7, 10/2016 datasheet in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/VDD-HIGH-IN-question-in-Rev-7-10-2016-datasheet/m-p/645575#M98520</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear&amp;nbsp; Sir&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;my customer has a old design, they using PF0100 Vgen6(3.3V) for VDD_HIGH_IN,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but latest datasheet, add VDD_HIGH_IN max value is 2.85V in LDO bypass mode,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="未命名.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/9016iD9AE428100D6282A/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="未命名.png" alt="未命名.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Table 8. Operating Ranges&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="未命名1.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/9054i29CF8B0E5F65BDF8/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="未命名1.png" alt="未命名1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this info let them so confuse,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but they can't modify H/W in current status,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;could they keep original design ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or they&amp;nbsp;could to modify vgen6 output in u-boot/kernel ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Max&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2016 03:46:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MaxChou</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-12-04T03:46:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VDD_HIGH_IN question in Rev. 7, 10/2016 datasheet</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/VDD-HIGH-IN-question-in-Rev-7-10-2016-datasheet/m-p/645575#M98520</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear&amp;nbsp; Sir&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;my customer has a old design, they using PF0100 Vgen6(3.3V) for VDD_HIGH_IN,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but latest datasheet, add VDD_HIGH_IN max value is 2.85V in LDO bypass mode,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="未命名.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/9016iD9AE428100D6282A/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="未命名.png" alt="未命名.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Table 8. Operating Ranges&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="未命名1.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/9054i29CF8B0E5F65BDF8/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="未命名1.png" alt="未命名1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this info let them so confuse,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but they can't modify H/W in current status,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;could they keep original design ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or they&amp;nbsp;could to modify vgen6 output in u-boot/kernel ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Max&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2016 03:46:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/VDD-HIGH-IN-question-in-Rev-7-10-2016-datasheet/m-p/645575#M98520</guid>
      <dc:creator>MaxChou</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-04T03:46:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VDD_HIGH_IN question in Rev. 7, 10/2016 datasheet</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/VDD-HIGH-IN-question-in-Rev-7-10-2016-datasheet/m-p/645576#M98521</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Max,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm checking this for you and will try to confirm shortly, but I believe this is an error in our doc update. The regulators associated with VDD_HIGH_IN do not support bypass mode, so there is no need for the LDO bypass definition and you should be able to ignore this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will confirm this ASAP and if I am correct we will look to correct this in the next doc update.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ross&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 13:08:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/VDD-HIGH-IN-question-in-Rev-7-10-2016-datasheet/m-p/645576#M98521</guid>
      <dc:creator>RossMcLuckie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-05T13:08:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VDD_HIGH_IN question in Rev. 7, 10/2016 datasheet</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/VDD-HIGH-IN-question-in-Rev-7-10-2016-datasheet/m-p/645577#M98522</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just to confirm this is indeed a documentation error that you can ignore until we update the document and remove the incorrect "VDD_HIGH_IN supply voltage (LDO bypass entries)".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ross&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 15:04:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/VDD-HIGH-IN-question-in-Rev-7-10-2016-datasheet/m-p/645577#M98522</guid>
      <dc:creator>RossMcLuckie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-05T15:04:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VDD_HIGH_IN question in Rev. 7, 10/2016 datasheet</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/VDD-HIGH-IN-question-in-Rev-7-10-2016-datasheet/m-p/645578#M98523</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the typo in the documentation since the VDD_HIGH regulator just doesn't have the bypass mode. Just ignore it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have a great day,&lt;BR /&gt;Artur&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:33:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/VDD-HIGH-IN-question-in-Rev-7-10-2016-datasheet/m-p/645578#M98523</guid>
      <dc:creator>art</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-21T10:33:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

