<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IMX6Q IPU2 seems to be slower in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-IPU2-seems-to-be-slower/m-p/582929#M88516</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Igor,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tried setting the same value for GPR7 but it's of no use.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And the output of the mmdc profiling tool when the capture is running is as follows,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i.MX6Q detected.&lt;BR /&gt;MMDC SUM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MMDC new Profiling results:&lt;BR /&gt;***********************&lt;BR /&gt;Measure time: 501ms &lt;BR /&gt;Total cycles count: 264063872&lt;BR /&gt;Busy cycles count: 62977561&lt;BR /&gt;Read accesses count: 911812&lt;BR /&gt;Write accesses count: 14308&lt;BR /&gt;Read bytes count: 56734868&lt;BR /&gt;Write bytes count: 763856&lt;BR /&gt;Avg. Read burst size: 62&lt;BR /&gt;Avg. Write burst size: 53&lt;BR /&gt;Read: 108.00 MB/s /&amp;nbsp; Write: 1.45 MB/s&amp;nbsp; Total: 109.45 MB/s &lt;BR /&gt;Utilization: 5%&lt;BR /&gt;Overall Bus Load: 25%&lt;BR /&gt;Bytes Access: 62&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 02:44:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>guna007</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-09-07T02:44:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IMX6Q IPU2 seems to be slower</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-IPU2-seems-to-be-slower/m-p/582925#M88512</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am able to capture image through second Parallel port with IPU2. But the image capture seems to be very slower. With the same image sensor with parallel 1 and IPU1, we are able to getting 50 - 60 fps but with parallel 2 and IPU2 we are achieving only 4 - 5 fps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any clock setting has to be done for IPU2?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FYI, I am using HDMI display as well which uses IPU2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 10:07:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-IPU2-seems-to-be-slower/m-p/582925#M88512</guid>
      <dc:creator>guna007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-01T10:07:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX6Q IPU2 seems to be slower</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-IPU2-seems-to-be-slower/m-p/582926#M88513</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Gunasekaran&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this may be caused by high load on IPU2 buses so for test one&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;can try to disable hdmi. Also one can check IPU QoS settings&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in IOMUXC_GPR6.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:45:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-IPU2-seems-to-be-slower/m-p/582926#M88513</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-02T00:45:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX6Q IPU2 seems to be slower</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-IPU2-seems-to-be-slower/m-p/582927#M88514</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Igor,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The value of GPR7(for IPU2) is 0x007F007F which is set through u-boot configuration. What should be the value for this register if priority has to be set high for IPU2 (QoS).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And, I tried disabling the HDMI and it's of no use.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Guna&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 10:58:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-IPU2-seems-to-be-slower/m-p/582927#M88514</guid>
      <dc:creator>guna007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-05T10:58:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX6Q IPU2 seems to be slower</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-IPU2-seems-to-be-slower/m-p/582928#M88515</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Gunasekaran&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;one can set GPR7 for IPU2 the same as for IPU1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also one can check bus load using memory profile tool&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mmdc2 which included in imx-test package (../test/mmdc).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/www.nxp.com/lgfiles/NMG/MAD/YOCTO/imx-test-5.4.tar.gz" target="test_blank"&gt;www.nxp.com/lgfiles/NMG/MAD/YOCTO/imx-test-5.4.tar.gz&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:01:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-IPU2-seems-to-be-slower/m-p/582928#M88515</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-06T00:01:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX6Q IPU2 seems to be slower</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-IPU2-seems-to-be-slower/m-p/582929#M88516</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Igor,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tried setting the same value for GPR7 but it's of no use.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And the output of the mmdc profiling tool when the capture is running is as follows,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i.MX6Q detected.&lt;BR /&gt;MMDC SUM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MMDC new Profiling results:&lt;BR /&gt;***********************&lt;BR /&gt;Measure time: 501ms &lt;BR /&gt;Total cycles count: 264063872&lt;BR /&gt;Busy cycles count: 62977561&lt;BR /&gt;Read accesses count: 911812&lt;BR /&gt;Write accesses count: 14308&lt;BR /&gt;Read bytes count: 56734868&lt;BR /&gt;Write bytes count: 763856&lt;BR /&gt;Avg. Read burst size: 62&lt;BR /&gt;Avg. Write burst size: 53&lt;BR /&gt;Read: 108.00 MB/s /&amp;nbsp; Write: 1.45 MB/s&amp;nbsp; Total: 109.45 MB/s &lt;BR /&gt;Utilization: 5%&lt;BR /&gt;Overall Bus Load: 25%&lt;BR /&gt;Bytes Access: 62&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 02:44:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-IPU2-seems-to-be-slower/m-p/582929#M88516</guid>
      <dc:creator>guna007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-07T02:44:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX6Q IPU2 seems to be slower</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-IPU2-seems-to-be-slower/m-p/582930#M88517</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Sir,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The value of GPR6 and GPR7 all setting are 0x007F007F .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Uboot have comment&amp;nbsp; "&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d;"&gt;/* set IPU AXI-id0 Qos=0xf(bypass) AXI-id1 Qos=0x7 */"&lt;/SPAN&gt; .&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why should this register only set ID00 to bypass? Why ID1 is 0x7 ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 02:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6Q-IPU2-seems-to-be-slower/m-p/582930#M88517</guid>
      <dc:creator>weikeng-jimmy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-20T02:31:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

