<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VDD_SOC_IN in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/VDD-SOC-IN/m-p/509216#M82923</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi BOMS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. in general the higher the voltage level on VDDSOC_CAP, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the less jitter. If there are jitter issues, an easy fix is to raise VDDSOC_CAP. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/data_sheet/IMX6DQCEC.pdf" title="http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/data_sheet/IMX6DQCEC.pdf"&gt;http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/data_sheet/IMX6DQCEC.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; Table 6. Operating Ranges footnote 4:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VDD_ARM_IN and VDD_SOC_IN must be at least 125 mV higher than the LDO Output Set Point for correct voltage regulation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2016 10:28:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-01-24T10:28:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VDD_SOC_IN</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/VDD-SOC-IN/m-p/509215#M82922</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are developing an i.MX6 SOM that is designed to have common hardware for the SOLO, Dual, and Quad processors.&amp;nbsp; We need to increase LDO_SOC to 1.225 to operate the VPU above 264MHz. Two questions have arisen,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 - We noticed that there seems to be mention of reducing DDR jitter if LDO_SOC is 2.275V is this important?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 - We were considering increasing the VDD_SOC_IN to 1.45V to margin the input above the drop in the internal LDO. Is this reasonable?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BW&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 22:14:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/VDD-SOC-IN/m-p/509215#M82922</guid>
      <dc:creator>bomsweigh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-22T22:14:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VDD_SOC_IN</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/VDD-SOC-IN/m-p/509216#M82923</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi BOMS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. in general the higher the voltage level on VDDSOC_CAP, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the less jitter. If there are jitter issues, an easy fix is to raise VDDSOC_CAP. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/data_sheet/IMX6DQCEC.pdf" title="http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/data_sheet/IMX6DQCEC.pdf"&gt;http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/data_sheet/IMX6DQCEC.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; Table 6. Operating Ranges footnote 4:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VDD_ARM_IN and VDD_SOC_IN must be at least 125 mV higher than the LDO Output Set Point for correct voltage regulation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2016 10:28:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/VDD-SOC-IN/m-p/509216#M82923</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-24T10:28:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VDD_SOC_IN</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/VDD-SOC-IN/m-p/509217#M82924</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the quick reply.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 13:29:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/VDD-SOC-IN/m-p/509217#M82924</guid>
      <dc:creator>bomsweigh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-25T13:29:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

