<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic DDR3 Routing on IMX6 in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DDR3-Routing-on-IMX6/m-p/508972#M82872</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One final question about the IMX6 layout.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the hardware design checklist provided by NXP item 7 under DDR states that T is suggested four 4 or less DDR ICS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have an IMX53 design using Flyby that worked great for us.&amp;nbsp; We were hoping to reuse that part of the design. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a problem with the IMX6 that makes T routing preferable to Fly-By? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BW&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="906"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD class="xl67" height="40" width="47"&gt;7&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD class="xl68" style="border-left: none;" width="859"&gt;Suggest to use "T" topology when the number of DDR chips are not more than four(two on top, two on bottom). &lt;BR /&gt; Otherwise "Fly-by" Topology is recommended for more than two chips on same PCB side. &lt;SPAN class="font5"&gt;Using the same as last SOM.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:42:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bomsweigh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-02-15T16:42:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DDR3 Routing on IMX6</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DDR3-Routing-on-IMX6/m-p/508972#M82872</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One final question about the IMX6 layout.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the hardware design checklist provided by NXP item 7 under DDR states that T is suggested four 4 or less DDR ICS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have an IMX53 design using Flyby that worked great for us.&amp;nbsp; We were hoping to reuse that part of the design. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a problem with the IMX6 that makes T routing preferable to Fly-By? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BW&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="906"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD class="xl67" height="40" width="47"&gt;7&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD class="xl68" style="border-left: none;" width="859"&gt;Suggest to use "T" topology when the number of DDR chips are not more than four(two on top, two on bottom). &lt;BR /&gt; Otherwise "Fly-by" Topology is recommended for more than two chips on same PCB side. &lt;SPAN class="font5"&gt;Using the same as last SOM.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:42:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DDR3-Routing-on-IMX6/m-p/508972#M82872</guid>
      <dc:creator>bomsweigh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-15T16:42:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DDR3 Routing on IMX6</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DDR3-Routing-on-IMX6/m-p/508973#M82873</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi BOMs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hardware design checklist provided topologies carefully tested and verified&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on real board designs. In general one can try other options, however it is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;recommended to perform ibis modeling for each case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 01:38:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DDR3-Routing-on-IMX6/m-p/508973#M82873</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-16T01:38:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

