<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>i.MX ProcessorsのトピックRe: IMX6 TskewT</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6-TskewT/m-p/492583#M79146</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, is DDR_SEL in IOMUXC_SW_PAD_CTL_GRP_DDR_TYPE_RGMII set to b11 in u-boot for Sabre SD, since NVCC_RGMII is 1.5V?&amp;nbsp; Or is it left at the default b10 (1.2V)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For DSE in IOMUXC_SW_PAD_CTL_PAD_RGMII_RXC, the default is b110.&amp;nbsp; This is 37 ohms, too low for most boards.&amp;nbsp; Is it set anywhere in u-boot?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did a grep for IOMUXC_SW_PAD_CTL_GRP_DDR_TYPE_RGMII and IOMUXC_SW_PAD_CTL_PAD_RGMII_RXC and found nothing. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 04:58:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>inderjitbains</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-04-11T04:58:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IMX6 TskewT</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6-TskewT/m-p/492578#M79141</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Section 4.11.5.3 of IMX6DQIEC, Table 58 states that TskewT is -100 to +900 ps.&amp;nbsp; Is this instead of the nominal +/- 500 ps, i.e. a delay of 400ps?&amp;nbsp; Is this adjustable in a register or fixed? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note 3 states that this implies a TXC delay at the PHY of 1.2ns to 1.7ns instead of the nominal 1.5ns to 2.0ns - shouldn't this be 1.1ns to 1.6ns, if the TSC delay is 400ps? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note 3 also says that this is for all versions of RGMII prior to 2.0.&amp;nbsp; What if the PHY is RGMII 2.0?&amp;nbsp; Does the PHY just add the delay instead of implementing the delay on the PCB?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 06:16:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6-TskewT/m-p/492578#M79141</guid>
      <dc:creator>inderjitbains</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-10T06:16:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX6 TskewT</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6-TskewT/m-p/492579#M79142</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Inderjit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-&amp;nbsp; this delay option is not configurable in i.MX6 ENET. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; A delay should be implemented at the board level.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- what is "TSC delay" ? Seems this additional board delay should not&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; depend on any delay, since it just adds timing for compliance with&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; ver.1.3 RGMII specification.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- i.MX6 ENET is compliant with RGMII 1.3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Regarding RGMII 2.0 PHY it is working fine with i.MX6 ENET,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; I am not sure if delay can be implemented in PHY, seems it&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; is necessary to verify with its datasheet and perform ibis&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; modelling.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 01:14:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6-TskewT/m-p/492579#M79142</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-11T01:14:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX6 TskewT</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6-TskewT/m-p/492580#M79143</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;As long as the delay is constant at 400ps, the remaining delay can be added in the PHY instead of adding an additional delay at the board level (longer trace).&amp;nbsp; Can you confirm that it is constant at 400ps?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 01:43:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6-TskewT/m-p/492580#M79143</guid>
      <dc:creator>inderjitbains</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-11T01:43:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX6 TskewT</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6-TskewT/m-p/492581#M79144</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;could you clarify what is "delay is constant at 400ps" ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 02:04:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6-TskewT/m-p/492581#M79144</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-11T02:04:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX6 TskewT</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6-TskewT/m-p/492582#M79145</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Section 4.11.5.3 of IMX6DQIEC, Table 58 states that TskewT is -100 to +900ps.&amp;nbsp; Normally, this is -500ps to +500ps.&amp;nbsp; -100ps to +900ps is the same as adding a 400ps delay.&amp;nbsp; Can you confirm that a TskewT of -100ps to +900ps will effectively delay RGMII_TXC by 400ps, and that -100ps to +900ps are the lower and upper bounds from -40C to +85C?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 03:25:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6-TskewT/m-p/492582#M79145</guid>
      <dc:creator>inderjitbains</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-11T03:25:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX6 TskewT</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6-TskewT/m-p/492583#M79146</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, is DDR_SEL in IOMUXC_SW_PAD_CTL_GRP_DDR_TYPE_RGMII set to b11 in u-boot for Sabre SD, since NVCC_RGMII is 1.5V?&amp;nbsp; Or is it left at the default b10 (1.2V)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For DSE in IOMUXC_SW_PAD_CTL_PAD_RGMII_RXC, the default is b110.&amp;nbsp; This is 37 ohms, too low for most boards.&amp;nbsp; Is it set anywhere in u-boot?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did a grep for IOMUXC_SW_PAD_CTL_GRP_DDR_TYPE_RGMII and IOMUXC_SW_PAD_CTL_PAD_RGMII_RXC and found nothing. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 04:58:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6-TskewT/m-p/492583#M79146</guid>
      <dc:creator>inderjitbains</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-11T04:58:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IMX6 TskewT</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6-TskewT/m-p/492584#M79147</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes, "TskewT of -100ps to +900ps will effectively delay RGMII_TXC by 400ps".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Table 62. RGMII Signal Switching Specifications provides timings &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-100ps to +900ps for full temperature range specified by datashet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IMX6DQIEC&amp;nbsp; rev.4&amp;nbsp; 7_2015.pdf document in Table 6. Operating Ranges &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;defines Junction temperature -40 :- 105C.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For DSE in IOMUXC_SW_PAD_CTL_PAD_RGMII_RXC suggest to create&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;new thread.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 06:22:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX6-TskewT/m-p/492584#M79147</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-11T06:22:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

