<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>i.MX Processors中的主题 Re: imx6sx DDR cacheability</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6sx-DDR-cacheability/m-p/487762#M78128</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; perhaps the problem concerns with the fact, that cache coherency &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is not provided in i.MX6 SX. The debugger is working in physical addresses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yuri.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 08:25:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-22T08:25:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>imx6sx DDR cacheability</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6sx-DDR-cacheability/m-p/487759#M78125</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Everybody,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a bare-metal code running on M4 core.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The core executes, from DDR, much slower than expected, that means more than 10 times slower than executing from TCM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suspect the cache is not properly configured.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The cache controller is enabled using the LMEM_EnableSystemCache() and LMEM_EnableCodeCache() provided by NXP on FreeRTOS example.There is no effect for execution time after calling LMEM functions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did not find anything about cacheability.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any way to define/check the DDR cacheability for M4? I mean to define DDR regions as cacheable/non-cacheable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:27:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6sx-DDR-cacheability/m-p/487759#M78125</guid>
      <dc:creator>catalinzafiu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-18T12:27:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: imx6sx DDR cacheability</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6sx-DDR-cacheability/m-p/487760#M78126</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; The base address of LMEM is 0xE008_2000.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The RM in section 13.11 (LMEM Memory Map/Register Definition) contains&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;misprints.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a great day,&lt;BR /&gt;Yuri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 02:36:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6sx-DDR-cacheability/m-p/487760#M78126</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-21T02:36:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: imx6sx DDR cacheability</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6sx-DDR-cacheability/m-p/487761#M78127</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Yuri,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have updated the base address. The cache is working now, the execution time is as expected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After enabling the cache, the Segger J-Link debugger seems not able to stop in breakpoints. Do you have any hint for that?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Catalin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:28:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6sx-DDR-cacheability/m-p/487761#M78127</guid>
      <dc:creator>catalinzafiu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-21T11:28:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: imx6sx DDR cacheability</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6sx-DDR-cacheability/m-p/487762#M78128</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; perhaps the problem concerns with the fact, that cache coherency &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is not provided in i.MX6 SX. The debugger is working in physical addresses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yuri.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 08:25:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6sx-DDR-cacheability/m-p/487762#M78128</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-22T08:25:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: imx6sx DDR cacheability</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6sx-DDR-cacheability/m-p/487763#M78129</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Yuri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 09:04:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6sx-DDR-cacheability/m-p/487763#M78129</guid>
      <dc:creator>catalinzafiu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-22T09:04:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: imx6sx DDR cacheability</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6sx-DDR-cacheability/m-p/487764#M78130</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, as I understood the cacheability has effect on the whole DDR region, right? Is it possible to enable the cacheability for a specified DDR region?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:27:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx6sx-DDR-cacheability/m-p/487764#M78130</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnesmith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-07T00:27:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

