<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Sabre SD Dual / Quad... in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Sabre-SD-Dual-Quad/m-p/478269#M75997</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Andy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;early prototype did not support wait mode, one can try to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;test mass production version with kernel boot parameter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;enable_wait_mode=off&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 02:11:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-01-09T02:11:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Sabre SD Dual / Quad...</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Sabre-SD-Dual-Quad/m-p/478268#M75996</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sorry to bother with this issue, but maybe my initial question (configuring Sabre SD for iMX6 Dual mode) was wrong...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Problem is: We have two Sabre SD boards, one equipped with an early prototype of the 1GHz Quad, the other one with a mass production type. Our SW development team reports "significant" performance differences between the two, using the same SD boot medium... Any idea?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 22:00:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Sabre-SD-Dual-Quad/m-p/478268#M75996</guid>
      <dc:creator>lcdguru</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-08T22:00:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sabre SD Dual / Quad...</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Sabre-SD-Dual-Quad/m-p/478269#M75997</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Andy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;early prototype did not support wait mode, one can try to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;test mass production version with kernel boot parameter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;enable_wait_mode=off&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 02:11:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Sabre-SD-Dual-Quad/m-p/478269#M75997</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-09T02:11:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

