<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>i.MX Processorsのトピック2layer routing example....</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/2layer-routing-example/m-p/449953#M69656</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There's this "MX28_DDR2_Escape_routing_example" layout file... I really can't recall where I got it, but it's somehow related to AN4215 ("2-Layer Escape Routing Example" section).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="pastedImage_0.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/61167i94D8B4E9BE4C8D4B/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="pastedImage_0.png" alt="pastedImage_0.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I this layout example, I found something that I don't understand:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="pastedImage_2.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/61168iDDDFD453A6B129C3/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="pastedImage_2.png" alt="pastedImage_2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pins K14 and K15 are shorted together, and L15 is tied to VDD_EMI. However: according to IMX28 pinout, the pins that do need to be shorted (EMI_DDR_OPEN and EMI_DDR_OPEN_FB) are K14 and L15, whereas K15 shall be tied to VDD_EMI (1V8).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are others discrepancies in the IMX pinout: for instance, M11, M12 pins are connected to GND. However, according to the datasheet, those pins are to be connected to VDD...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone confirm those discrepancies?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks indeed, best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 08:50:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>albertguardiola</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-07-02T08:50:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>2layer routing example....</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/2layer-routing-example/m-p/449953#M69656</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There's this "MX28_DDR2_Escape_routing_example" layout file... I really can't recall where I got it, but it's somehow related to AN4215 ("2-Layer Escape Routing Example" section).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="pastedImage_0.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/61167i94D8B4E9BE4C8D4B/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="pastedImage_0.png" alt="pastedImage_0.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I this layout example, I found something that I don't understand:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="pastedImage_2.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/61168iDDDFD453A6B129C3/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="pastedImage_2.png" alt="pastedImage_2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pins K14 and K15 are shorted together, and L15 is tied to VDD_EMI. However: according to IMX28 pinout, the pins that do need to be shorted (EMI_DDR_OPEN and EMI_DDR_OPEN_FB) are K14 and L15, whereas K15 shall be tied to VDD_EMI (1V8).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are others discrepancies in the IMX pinout: for instance, M11, M12 pins are connected to GND. However, according to the datasheet, those pins are to be connected to VDD...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone confirm those discrepancies?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks indeed, best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 08:50:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/2layer-routing-example/m-p/449953#M69656</guid>
      <dc:creator>albertguardiola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-02T08:50:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2layer routing example....</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/2layer-routing-example/m-p/449954#M69657</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please use the i.MX28 EVK design as PCB example.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; According to the recent i.MX28&amp;nbsp; Datasheet&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EMI_DDR_OPEN is K14 pin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EMI_DDR_OPEN_FB is L15 pin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://community.freescale.com/external-link.jspa?url=http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/data_sheet/IMX28AEC.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/data_sheet/IMX28AEC.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; The i.MX28 EVK design uses the same pin assignment, and the trace is not very short.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="DDR_open.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/61170i406145453C09B8F0/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="DDR_open.jpg" alt="DDR_open.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The information of MX28_DDR2_Escape_Routing_Example - is incorrect and I informed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the team about it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a great day,&lt;BR /&gt;Yuri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 09:32:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/2layer-routing-example/m-p/449954#M69657</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-02T09:32:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2layer routing example....</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/2layer-routing-example/m-p/449955#M69658</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks indeed Yuri,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That makes sense.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 09:37:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/2layer-routing-example/m-p/449955#M69658</guid>
      <dc:creator>albertguardiola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-02T09:37:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2layer routing example....</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/2layer-routing-example/m-p/449956#M69659</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi again Yuri,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can see that, in the EVK, DDR2 address lines are routed so that their length is approximately two times the lenght of clock and data lines. We do not understand the reason why this is done that way. As far as we know, this is not advised in usual DDR2 routing guidelines. Can you provide some information on this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks indeed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 07:13:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/2layer-routing-example/m-p/449956#M69659</guid>
      <dc:creator>albertguardiola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-03T07:13:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2layer routing example....</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/2layer-routing-example/m-p/449957#M69660</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="padding: 0 0 24.0pt 0;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif';"&gt;&amp;nbsp; Basically, the best approach - to use simulation technique for PCB design.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif';"&gt;In the same time, general rules may be provided for customers to simplify their &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif';"&gt;PCB considerations, but note, for assurance such rules are very strong.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif';"&gt;&amp;nbsp; Section 5.2 (Routing) of app note AN4215 (i.MX28 Layout and Design &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif';"&gt;Guidelines) provides general considerations regarding PCB design &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif';"&gt;with i.MX28.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif';"&gt;&amp;nbsp; The EVK may violate some rules, since it was design before recommendations &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif';"&gt;were issued.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding: 0 0 24.0pt 0;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif';"&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif';"&gt;Yuri.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding: 0 0 24.0pt 0;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 03:06:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/2layer-routing-example/m-p/449957#M69660</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-06T03:06:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

