<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic JTAG Interface not as per IMX6SLHDG ? in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/JTAG-Interface-not-as-per-IMX6SLHDG/m-p/403531#M59799</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the Hardware Dev. Guide for SoloLite - imx6slhdg.pdf document, there are recommendations provided for JTAG connections. But in the SoloLite Evaluation Kit schematics - MCIMX6SLEVK, the JTAG seems to be different.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/23041iBA4AF547F3277FD6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" title="term_rec.png" alt="term_rec.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/23021i2FC97FF72F26AEB6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" title="JTAG signals.jpg" alt="JTAG signals.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;For JTAG_TDO it is mentioned "Do not use pullup or pulldown" still a 10K option is provided (although it is DNP)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;JTAG_TCK has On-Chip 47K pullup (can use 10K pullup optional), but in schematics a 10K pulldown is provided.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let me know the HDG vs EVK changes, what JTAG device can be used for MCIMX6SLEVK.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should we follow the SL EVK schematics or refer the IMX6SLHDG ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;~Pankaj Rana&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:45:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pankajrana</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-16T10:45:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>JTAG Interface not as per IMX6SLHDG ?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/JTAG-Interface-not-as-per-IMX6SLHDG/m-p/403531#M59799</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the Hardware Dev. Guide for SoloLite - imx6slhdg.pdf document, there are recommendations provided for JTAG connections. But in the SoloLite Evaluation Kit schematics - MCIMX6SLEVK, the JTAG seems to be different.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/23041iBA4AF547F3277FD6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" title="term_rec.png" alt="term_rec.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/23021i2FC97FF72F26AEB6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" title="JTAG signals.jpg" alt="JTAG signals.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;For JTAG_TDO it is mentioned "Do not use pullup or pulldown" still a 10K option is provided (although it is DNP)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;JTAG_TCK has On-Chip 47K pullup (can use 10K pullup optional), but in schematics a 10K pulldown is provided.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let me know the HDG vs EVK changes, what JTAG device can be used for MCIMX6SLEVK.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should we follow the SL EVK schematics or refer the IMX6SLHDG ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;~Pankaj Rana&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:45:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/JTAG-Interface-not-as-per-IMX6SLHDG/m-p/403531#M59799</guid>
      <dc:creator>pankajrana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-16T10:45:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: JTAG Interface not as per IMX6SLHDG ?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/JTAG-Interface-not-as-per-IMX6SLHDG/m-p/403532#M59800</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Pankaj&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;correct description gives Hardware Dev. Guide for SoloLite,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;as for JTAG_TCK has On-Chip 47K pullup, R395 should be DNP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2015 01:57:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/JTAG-Interface-not-as-per-IMX6SLHDG/m-p/403532#M59800</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-17T01:57:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

