<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>i.MX Processors中的主题 Re: PXP testing</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/PXP-testing/m-p/399504#M58842</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tested PXP unit-test with the latest imx7D release and I faced exactly the same error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:32:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>daiane_angolini</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-07-07T12:32:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PXP testing</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/PXP-testing/m-p/399500#M58838</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've had an ongoing discussion on the meta-freescale list about how to test the Pixel Pipeline (PXP) device.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2015-April/thread.html#13349" title="https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2015-April/thread.html#13349"&gt;https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2015-April/thread.html#13349&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In short, it appears that the unit_test program for the PXP is broken and not well documented, though the &lt;BR /&gt;gstreamer-1.0 pxp elements are partially functional.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Carlos used the gstreamer elements to perform a very thorough test of all pixel formats that are advertised by the driver:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2015-April/013376.html" title="https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2015-April/013376.html"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2015-April/013376.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It appears that support for many are broken.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please join the conversation if you have knowledge in this area.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2015 17:12:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/PXP-testing/m-p/399500#M58838</guid>
      <dc:creator>EricNelson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-11T17:12:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PXP testing</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/PXP-testing/m-p/399501#M58839</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jx-jive-macro-user" href="https://community.nxp.com/people/OtavioSalvador"&gt;OtavioSalvador&lt;/A&gt;, can you please comment on this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:17:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/PXP-testing/m-p/399501#M58839</guid>
      <dc:creator>jamesbone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-13T15:17:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PXP testing</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/PXP-testing/m-p/399502#M58840</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi James,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Otavio is the one who pointed out that we weren't including PXP in our device tree!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:06:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/PXP-testing/m-p/399502#M58840</guid>
      <dc:creator>EricNelson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-14T14:06:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PXP testing</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/PXP-testing/m-p/399503#M58841</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did forward the community thread on and waiting for a reply from the team that owns PXP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PXP (includdng unit test cases) will have updates in next release but not sure if that addresses this issue you reported.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 16:55:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/PXP-testing/m-p/399503#M58841</guid>
      <dc:creator>LaurenPost</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-16T16:55:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PXP testing</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/PXP-testing/m-p/399504#M58842</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tested PXP unit-test with the latest imx7D release and I faced exactly the same error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:32:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/PXP-testing/m-p/399504#M58842</guid>
      <dc:creator>daiane_angolini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T12:32:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

