<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Memory issues with i.mx233 rev. B in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Memory-issues-with-i-mx233-rev-B/m-p/396671#M58188</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Evgeny&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there are no changes related to DDR between rev. B and rev. C.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One can try to tweak drive strength of ddr signals for both of i.MX23 and memory&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and reuse i.MX28 memory test below&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/message/375692"&gt;Re: i.MX28 DDR stress test&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 01:58:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-15T01:58:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Memory issues with i.mx233 rev. B</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Memory-issues-with-i-mx233-rev-B/m-p/396670#M58187</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're using custom-made SoM based on Olinuxino Micro design in our products.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Couple of months ago we purchased the next small batch of SOCs. They turned out to be mcimx233cag4b , not mcimx233cag4c we successfully (500+ boards) used before. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We see memory problems with these&amp;nbsp; i.mx233 rev. B chips.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problems manifest itself during memory testing using memtester (&lt;A href="https://packages.debian.org/jessie/memtester"&gt;https://packages.debian.org/jessie/memtester&lt;/A&gt; ). The boards either&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 1) freeze during the test&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 2) or catch weird kernel OOOPS linked to NULL pointer derefence (which is clear sign of memory corruption)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some of the boards (10% - 20% or so) pass this test fine. Some work worse than others, i.e. freeze during first seconds of test, some of the boards can last dozens of minutes before error occurs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Again, we observed nothing like this in our previous batch, which was based on mcimx233cag4c.&amp;nbsp; The PCBs and other components are identical (same batch).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The memory chips (Alliance AS4C32M16D) are the same as before. Changing memory chips to tested ones doesn't help. Changing Alliance memory to Hynix or Samsung doesn't help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We also tried to play with memory settings, like changing CAS latency, frequency and so on - still nothing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, do you have any ideas what can possibly be wrong? Were there any changes related to DDR between rev. B and rev. C which are not covered in errata?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:18:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Memory-issues-with-i-mx233-rev-B/m-p/396670#M58187</guid>
      <dc:creator>evgenyboger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-14T14:18:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory issues with i.mx233 rev. B</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Memory-issues-with-i-mx233-rev-B/m-p/396671#M58188</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Evgeny&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there are no changes related to DDR between rev. B and rev. C.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One can try to tweak drive strength of ddr signals for both of i.MX23 and memory&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and reuse i.MX28 memory test below&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/message/375692"&gt;Re: i.MX28 DDR stress test&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 01:58:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Memory-issues-with-i-mx233-rev-B/m-p/396671#M58188</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-15T01:58:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

