<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic About period between CS and next CS with DTACK mode in i.MX6DQ. in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/About-period-between-CS-and-next-CS-with-DTACK-mode-in-i-MX6DQ/m-p/383434#M55449</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear Sir or Madam,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My customer is using EIM in DTACK mode with BCLK=100 MHz.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Refer to attached waveform.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The period of EIM_CSx_B=High (between CS active and CS active) =240 ns both of read/write.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They tuned up the CCM setting and the period shorted from 240 ns to 150 ns.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, their target is less than 100 ns.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Board: Custom board&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Software: Assembler code &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Other: No use the SDMA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you tell me the way of making short the interval of between CS active (Transfer data) and CS active (Transfer data)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Customer's setting]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EIM_CS1GCR1=01130481&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EIM_CS1GCR2=00000300&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EIM_CS1RCR1=01080000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EIM_CS1RCR2=00000008&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EIM_CS1WCR1=81000000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EIM_CS1WCR2=00000000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keita&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;メッセージ編集者: Keita Nagashima&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:56:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>keitanagashima</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-03-13T00:56:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>About period between CS and next CS with DTACK mode in i.MX6DQ.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/About-period-between-CS-and-next-CS-with-DTACK-mode-in-i-MX6DQ/m-p/383434#M55449</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear Sir or Madam,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My customer is using EIM in DTACK mode with BCLK=100 MHz.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Refer to attached waveform.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The period of EIM_CSx_B=High (between CS active and CS active) =240 ns both of read/write.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They tuned up the CCM setting and the period shorted from 240 ns to 150 ns.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, their target is less than 100 ns.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Board: Custom board&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Software: Assembler code &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Other: No use the SDMA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you tell me the way of making short the interval of between CS active (Transfer data) and CS active (Transfer data)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Customer's setting]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EIM_CS1GCR1=01130481&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EIM_CS1GCR2=00000300&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EIM_CS1RCR1=01080000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EIM_CS1RCR2=00000008&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EIM_CS1WCR1=81000000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EIM_CS1WCR2=00000000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keita&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;メッセージ編集者: Keita Nagashima&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:56:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/About-period-between-CS-and-next-CS-with-DTACK-mode-in-i-MX6DQ/m-p/383434#M55449</guid>
      <dc:creator>keitanagashima</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-13T00:56:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: About period between CS and next CS with DTACK mode in i.MX6DQ.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/About-period-between-CS-and-next-CS-with-DTACK-mode-in-i-MX6DQ/m-p/383435#M55450</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Keita&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interval between several active CSn can not be configured or shortened&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and it is defined by internal buses latencies (including bus arbitration delays).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Period "240 ns to 150 ns" complies with data obtained from design. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/About-period-between-CS-and-next-CS-with-DTACK-mode-in-i-MX6DQ/m-p/383435#M55450</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-30T13:53:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

