<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Will tDQSQ value abnormality effect the communication with IMX6? in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Will-tDQSQ-value-abnormality-effect-the-communication-with-IMX6/m-p/349365#M48454</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;SPAN class="replyToName" style="font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit;"&gt;Igor Padykov，&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your kindly help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As we had performed the DDR stress test using the stress tester tool, I think the deviation should be just caused&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;by placement of oscilloscope probe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the communication between the CPU and DDR3 is normal although the tDQSQ value is not "correct". Then, we can ignore the deviation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you agree with my understanding? If I am wrong, please kindly correct me, thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 03:09:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>王剑翰</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-08-13T03:09:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Will tDQSQ value abnormality effect the communication with IMX6?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Will-tDQSQ-value-abnormality-effect-the-communication-with-IMX6/m-p/349363#M48452</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Last week we&amp;nbsp; tested DDR singal&amp;nbsp; of read mode. The value of&amp;nbsp; tDQSQ-Diff&amp;nbsp; is 235.14ps and that’s more than the high limit 200ps found to fail.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But the communication between the CPU(I.MX6S) and DDR3 is normal now. For CPU, this one even if NG, is no effect on communication, can we think so?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:55:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Will-tDQSQ-value-abnormality-effect-the-communication-with-IMX6/m-p/349363#M48452</guid>
      <dc:creator>王剑翰</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-11T08:55:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Will tDQSQ value abnormality effect the communication with IMX6?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Will-tDQSQ-value-abnormality-effect-the-communication-with-IMX6/m-p/349364#M48453</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi 王 剑翰 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;value of&amp;nbsp; tDQSQ-Diff&amp;nbsp; is 235.14ps may be just caused&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;by placement of oscilloscope probe,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;since for example for FR4 board trace length may lead to delay&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;about 7ps/mm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also for correct tDQSQ one needs to perform ddr calibration,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;check sect.13 "Read DQS Delay Calibration"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/app_note/AN4467.pdf?fasp=1&amp;amp;WT_TYPE=Application%20Notes&amp;amp;WT_VENDOR=FREESCALE&amp;amp;WT_FILE_FORMAT=pdf&amp;amp;WT_ASSET=Documentation&amp;amp;fileExt=.pdf"&gt;AN4467&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; i.MX 6 Series DDR Calibration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;chip&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 13:13:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Will-tDQSQ-value-abnormality-effect-the-communication-with-IMX6/m-p/349364#M48453</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-11T13:13:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Will tDQSQ value abnormality effect the communication with IMX6?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Will-tDQSQ-value-abnormality-effect-the-communication-with-IMX6/m-p/349365#M48454</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;SPAN class="replyToName" style="font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit;"&gt;Igor Padykov，&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your kindly help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As we had performed the DDR stress test using the stress tester tool, I think the deviation should be just caused&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;by placement of oscilloscope probe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the communication between the CPU and DDR3 is normal although the tDQSQ value is not "correct". Then, we can ignore the deviation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you agree with my understanding? If I am wrong, please kindly correct me, thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 03:09:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Will-tDQSQ-value-abnormality-effect-the-communication-with-IMX6/m-p/349365#M48454</guid>
      <dc:creator>王剑翰</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-13T03:09:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Will tDQSQ value abnormality effect the communication with IMX6?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Will-tDQSQ-value-abnormality-effect-the-communication-with-IMX6/m-p/349366#M48455</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi 王 剑翰&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes, if processor works well&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you can safely ignore this. Your&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;understanding is right.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;chip&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 03:14:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Will-tDQSQ-value-abnormality-effect-the-communication-with-IMX6/m-p/349366#M48455</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-13T03:14:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Will tDQSQ value abnormality effect the communication with IMX6?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Will-tDQSQ-value-abnormality-effect-the-communication-with-IMX6/m-p/349367#M48456</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you~!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 03:25:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Will-tDQSQ-value-abnormality-effect-the-communication-with-IMX6/m-p/349367#M48456</guid>
      <dc:creator>王剑翰</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-13T03:25:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

