<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>i.MX ProcessorsのトピックSabreSD ENET_REF_CLK AC coupling</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/SabreSD-ENET-REF-CLK-AC-coupling/m-p/344595#M47522</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is there another reason for AC coupling at the ENET_REF_CLK input in SabreSD-design than adjusting the voltage levels?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my design I want to use 2.5V for all the Ethernet-related stuff (NVCC_ENET, NVCC_RGMII and VDDIO of the PHY) so connecting ENET_REF_CLK directly (only with a series resistor at the PHY's output) should be OK - or did I miss something?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Martin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:28:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mahi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-03-24T12:28:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SabreSD ENET_REF_CLK AC coupling</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/SabreSD-ENET-REF-CLK-AC-coupling/m-p/344595#M47522</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is there another reason for AC coupling at the ENET_REF_CLK input in SabreSD-design than adjusting the voltage levels?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my design I want to use 2.5V for all the Ethernet-related stuff (NVCC_ENET, NVCC_RGMII and VDDIO of the PHY) so connecting ENET_REF_CLK directly (only with a series resistor at the PHY's output) should be OK - or did I miss something?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Martin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:28:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/SabreSD-ENET-REF-CLK-AC-coupling/m-p/344595#M47522</guid>
      <dc:creator>mahi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-24T12:28:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SabreSD ENET_REF_CLK AC coupling</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/SabreSD-ENET-REF-CLK-AC-coupling/m-p/344596#M47523</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI Martin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree with you: with the same voltage for all the Ethernet-related stuff&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;connecting ENET_REF_CLK directly is OK.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 01:01:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/SabreSD-ENET-REF-CLK-AC-coupling/m-p/344596#M47523</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-25T01:01:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

