<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>i.MX ProcessorsのトピックEIM Bus Timing Parameters</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-Bus-Timing-Parameters/m-p/303817#M38769</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; In the i.MX6 Dual/Quad Applications Processor for Industrial Products data sheet, table 37 gives the EIM bus timing parameters.&amp;nbsp; They appear to not be related to the timing waveform diagrams: figure 12, 13, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; For example, the WE4 parameter is described as "Clock rise to address valid" and is a maximum value.&amp;nbsp; On Figure 12, the WE4 parameter is shown from EIM_ADDRxx to EIM_BCLK which does not make sense.&amp;nbsp; A maximum value from the address to BCLK does not match the description(or cause and effect)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I would assume the WE4 parameter is the clock to output time from EIM Clock(not BCLK) to the EIM_ADDRxx output.&amp;nbsp; That would also make sense if the value is a maximum(i.e. causing the minimum amount of setup time at the target).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Does anyone have the correct timing waveform diagrams that match the descriptions in table 37?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your time,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tom1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-03-25T17:58:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EIM Bus Timing Parameters</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-Bus-Timing-Parameters/m-p/303817#M38769</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; In the i.MX6 Dual/Quad Applications Processor for Industrial Products data sheet, table 37 gives the EIM bus timing parameters.&amp;nbsp; They appear to not be related to the timing waveform diagrams: figure 12, 13, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; For example, the WE4 parameter is described as "Clock rise to address valid" and is a maximum value.&amp;nbsp; On Figure 12, the WE4 parameter is shown from EIM_ADDRxx to EIM_BCLK which does not make sense.&amp;nbsp; A maximum value from the address to BCLK does not match the description(or cause and effect)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I would assume the WE4 parameter is the clock to output time from EIM Clock(not BCLK) to the EIM_ADDRxx output.&amp;nbsp; That would also make sense if the value is a maximum(i.e. causing the minimum amount of setup time at the target).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Does anyone have the correct timing waveform diagrams that match the descriptions in table 37?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your time,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-Bus-Timing-Parameters/m-p/303817#M38769</guid>
      <dc:creator>tom1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-25T17:58:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EIM Bus Timing Parameters</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-Bus-Timing-Parameters/m-p/303818#M38770</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, Tom&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there are no other timing waveform diagrams except provided in datsheet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also let me give some comments below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;On Figure 12, the WE4 parameter is shown from EIM_ADDRxx to EIM_BCLK &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;which does not make sense.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It does make sense because table 37 gives WE4 parameter with negative value,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;that is "WE4 parameter is the clock to output time from BCLK to the EIM_ADDRxx output"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;as you correctly assumed. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Figures 12, 13 are synchronous waveforms that is all EIM timings are referenced from BCLK,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;as correctly depicted on these pictures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2014 10:30:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-Bus-Timing-Parameters/m-p/303818#M38770</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-29T10:30:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EIM Bus Timing Parameters</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-Bus-Timing-Parameters/m-p/303819#M38771</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK.&amp;nbsp; I see what you are saying.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 12:54:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/EIM-Bus-Timing-Parameters/m-p/303819#M38771</guid>
      <dc:creator>tom1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-02T12:54:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

