<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>i.MX ProcessorsのトピックRe: DDR3 CLK termination</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DDR3-CLK-termination/m-p/162442#M3678</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think to same.So&amp;nbsp;I asked Freescale this&amp;nbsp;Question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Freescale's answer is "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;One can try 100 Ohm also. 200Ohm was proved as sufficient for obtaining best results.&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;".&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 09:08:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>T_I</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-29T09:08:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DDR3 CLK termination</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DDR3-CLK-termination/m-p/162441#M3677</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;We are in the rudimentary stage of Schemtic design of i.MX535 .DDR3 clock lines has been terminated with 200 ohm res in the ref schematic of Sabre.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question is , In general, differential clock will be terminated by 100 ohm . Can anyone explain, why they double the resistor value in Sabre design?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;UKR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:17:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DDR3-CLK-termination/m-p/162441#M3677</guid>
      <dc:creator>FreeScaleLogin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-21T11:17:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DDR3 CLK termination</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DDR3-CLK-termination/m-p/162442#M3678</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think to same.So&amp;nbsp;I asked Freescale this&amp;nbsp;Question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Freescale's answer is "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;One can try 100 Ohm also. 200Ohm was proved as sufficient for obtaining best results.&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;".&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 09:08:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DDR3-CLK-termination/m-p/162442#M3678</guid>
      <dc:creator>T_I</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-29T09:08:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

