<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic i.MX6SDL RGMII Tr/Tf. in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6SDL-RGMII-Tr-Tf/m-p/295302#M36509</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to confirm about i.MX6SDL RGMII spec.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please see Table 64 in IMX6SDCEC Rev.3, Tr/Tf are defined in this table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our partner guess these specs are difined when i.MX6 is TX because deive strength is mentioned in foot not No.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then, how about when i.MX6 is RX?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should all signals (clk, ctl, data, etc) satisfy thes RGMII specs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Satoshi Shimoda&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 08:57:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>satoshishimoda</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-05-12T08:57:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>i.MX6SDL RGMII Tr/Tf.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6SDL-RGMII-Tr-Tf/m-p/295302#M36509</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to confirm about i.MX6SDL RGMII spec.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please see Table 64 in IMX6SDCEC Rev.3, Tr/Tf are defined in this table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our partner guess these specs are difined when i.MX6 is TX because deive strength is mentioned in foot not No.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then, how about when i.MX6 is RX?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should all signals (clk, ctl, data, etc) satisfy thes RGMII specs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Satoshi Shimoda&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 08:57:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6SDL-RGMII-Tr-Tf/m-p/295302#M36509</guid>
      <dc:creator>satoshishimoda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-12T08:57:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: i.MX6SDL RGMII Tr/Tf.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6SDL-RGMII-Tr-Tf/m-p/295303#M36510</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; RGMII Tr/Tf relate to clock rise / fall times (at transmitter) .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have a great day,&lt;BR /&gt;Yuri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 10:51:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6SDL-RGMII-Tr-Tf/m-p/295303#M36510</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-13T10:51:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: i.MX6SDL RGMII Tr/Tf.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6SDL-RGMII-Tr-Tf/m-p/295304#M36511</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Yuri,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to your reply, there is no restriction about Tr/Tf of RGMII receiver, right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Satoshi Shimoda&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 01:44:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6SDL-RGMII-Tr-Tf/m-p/295304#M36511</guid>
      <dc:creator>satoshishimoda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-14T01:44:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: i.MX6SDL RGMII Tr/Tf.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6SDL-RGMII-Tr-Tf/m-p/295305#M36512</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; There are no restrictions for edges for receiver side as much as the transceiver &lt;BR /&gt;side meets the Tr / Tf requirements and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TskewT max of MAC is less than TskewR min of PHY ;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TskewT max of PHY is less than TskewR min of MAC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also PC board design clocks should be routed such that an additional trace&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;delay of greater than 1.5 ns and less than 2.0 ns will be added to the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;associated clock signal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have a great day,&lt;BR /&gt;Yuri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 09:55:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX6SDL-RGMII-Tr-Tf/m-p/295305#M36512</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-14T09:55:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

