<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic iMX53 QSB kernel memory map ( PHY vs VIRT) in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/iMX53-QSB-kernel-memory-map-PHY-vs-VIRT/m-p/159458#M2988</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV class="description"&gt;&lt;DIV class="xg_user_generated"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Noticed that AIPS1_BASE_ADDR in mx5x.h is defined to 0x73F00000 while iMX53RM.pdf states it as 0x53F00000.&amp;nbsp;A&amp;nbsp;0x20000000 difference exists.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Digging into it a bit and found that&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; if (cpu_is_mx53() || cpu_is_mx50()) {&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; for (i = 0; i &amp;lt; ARRAY_SIZE(mx5_io_desc); i++)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; mx5_io_desc[i].pfn -= __phys_to_pfn(0x20000000);&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; }&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in mach-mx5/mm.c. Seems like there is a offset value of 0x20000000 to fix it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know why there is such a offset fix? If I pass something to IO_ADDRESS(x) to get virtual address, should I use the true physical address or the address added with 0x2000000?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 23:17:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HuiShao</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-07T23:17:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>iMX53 QSB kernel memory map ( PHY vs VIRT)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/iMX53-QSB-kernel-memory-map-PHY-vs-VIRT/m-p/159458#M2988</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV class="description"&gt;&lt;DIV class="xg_user_generated"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Noticed that AIPS1_BASE_ADDR in mx5x.h is defined to 0x73F00000 while iMX53RM.pdf states it as 0x53F00000.&amp;nbsp;A&amp;nbsp;0x20000000 difference exists.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Digging into it a bit and found that&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; if (cpu_is_mx53() || cpu_is_mx50()) {&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; for (i = 0; i &amp;lt; ARRAY_SIZE(mx5_io_desc); i++)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; mx5_io_desc[i].pfn -= __phys_to_pfn(0x20000000);&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; }&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in mach-mx5/mm.c. Seems like there is a offset value of 0x20000000 to fix it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know why there is such a offset fix? If I pass something to IO_ADDRESS(x) to get virtual address, should I use the true physical address or the address added with 0x2000000?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 23:17:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/iMX53-QSB-kernel-memory-map-PHY-vs-VIRT/m-p/159458#M2988</guid>
      <dc:creator>HuiShao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-07T23:17:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

