<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CSI Parallel Interface on i.MX6 Dualite in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/CSI-Parallel-Interface-on-i-MX6-Dualite/m-p/263605#M26994</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using i.MX6 Duallite processor to interface a camera Sensor via its CSI-Parallel Port.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Camera Sensor requires a Master CLK ( a free running clock) which need to be supplied from the processor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In turn the Camera output consists of Data Lines [0:9], HSYNC, VSYNC and Pixel clock.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now the CSI Interface Pin-outs on the i.MX6 Dual Lite shows that the CSI0_MCLK is muxed with CSI0_HSYNC. In this case, what is the suggestion by Freescale community regarding the connectivity of MCLK and HSYNC signals?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 21:13:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>krishnaprasada</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-10-03T21:13:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CSI Parallel Interface on i.MX6 Dualite</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/CSI-Parallel-Interface-on-i-MX6-Dualite/m-p/263605#M26994</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using i.MX6 Duallite processor to interface a camera Sensor via its CSI-Parallel Port.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Camera Sensor requires a Master CLK ( a free running clock) which need to be supplied from the processor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In turn the Camera output consists of Data Lines [0:9], HSYNC, VSYNC and Pixel clock.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now the CSI Interface Pin-outs on the i.MX6 Dual Lite shows that the CSI0_MCLK is muxed with CSI0_HSYNC. In this case, what is the suggestion by Freescale community regarding the connectivity of MCLK and HSYNC signals?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 21:13:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/CSI-Parallel-Interface-on-i-MX6-Dualite/m-p/263605#M26994</guid>
      <dc:creator>krishnaprasada</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-03T21:13:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CSI Parallel Interface on i.MX6 Dualite</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/CSI-Parallel-Interface-on-i-MX6-Dualite/m-p/263606#M26995</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please reference to the SARBE SD board, the pin named CSI0_MCLK is configure as HSYNC input and the Master clock for camera is connected to the pin named GPIO_0. The GPIO_0 can provide clock output function. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 05:46:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/CSI-Parallel-Interface-on-i-MX6-Dualite/m-p/263606#M26995</guid>
      <dc:creator>aven_tsao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-04T05:46:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

