<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>i.MX ProcessorsのトピックRe: NVCC_LVDS_2P5 current consumption</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/NVCC-LVDS-2P5-current-consumption/m-p/257116#M24861</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, Gavin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I think you can just use the max VDDHIGH_IN power consumption to be the number you want, although it includes the PLL's power consumption. So ideally this VDDHIGH_IN's power consumption is higher than the actually max power of NVCC_LVDS_2P5. The typical max power of VDDHIGH_IN is around 85mA, so this 85mA exceed your platform's 2p5 power rail's capability? If you really want to get the real max power of NVCC_LVDS_2P5, then you may need to measure the power consumption on our SabreSD board, remove r600 and connect a current meter, then run the max power test case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 06:21:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AnsonHuang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-10-15T06:21:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NVCC_LVDS_2P5 current consumption</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/NVCC-LVDS-2P5-current-consumption/m-p/257113#M24858</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear Community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif';"&gt;In my iMX6Q application I am not using the LVDS interface. However, the datasheet states that the NVCC_LVDS_2P5 supply must be provided, as it also powers the DDR I/O pre-drivers. What is the maximum current consumption from this supply when LVDS is not used (the DDR will be used extensively)?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif';"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif';"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif';"&gt;Gavin.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif';"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:56:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/NVCC-LVDS-2P5-current-consumption/m-p/257113#M24858</guid>
      <dc:creator>gavinjones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-30T15:56:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NVCC_LVDS_2P5 current consumption</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/NVCC-LVDS-2P5-current-consumption/m-p/257114#M24859</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Gavin,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can calculate power measurements using the following application note:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/app_note/AN4509.pdf" title="http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/app_note/AN4509.pdf"&gt;http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/app_note/AN4509.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me know if you have any questions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 19:38:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/NVCC-LVDS-2P5-current-consumption/m-p/257114#M24859</guid>
      <dc:creator>SergioSolis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-01T19:38:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NVCC_LVDS_2P5 current consumption</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/NVCC-LVDS-2P5-current-consumption/m-p/257115#M24860</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello SerchMX,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AN4509 gives me a typical value for the current consumption into the VDDHIGH_IN pin. However, it does not break this figure down between the direct internal loads (PLLs) and the loads externally connected to the VDDHIGH_CAP pin (including NVCC_LVDS_2P5). Maximum values for a number of the loads are given in the data sheet, section 4.1.5, but NVCC_LVDS_2P5 is not included.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My application already has a 2.5V switching regulator supplying some of the iMX6 IOs. Therefore, for improved power efficiency, I plan to connect all the iMX6 2V5 loads (including NVCC_LVDS_2P5) directly to this rail, rather than to the VDDHIGH_CAP pin. However, I need to know the maximum current consumption of the NVCC_LVDS_2P5 load so as to ensure the switching regulator is rated high enough.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please can you provide an upper bound for the maximum current consumption of the NVCC_LVDS_2P5 load?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gavin.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 09:01:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/NVCC-LVDS-2P5-current-consumption/m-p/257115#M24860</guid>
      <dc:creator>gavinjones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-02T09:01:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NVCC_LVDS_2P5 current consumption</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/NVCC-LVDS-2P5-current-consumption/m-p/257116#M24861</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, Gavin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I think you can just use the max VDDHIGH_IN power consumption to be the number you want, although it includes the PLL's power consumption. So ideally this VDDHIGH_IN's power consumption is higher than the actually max power of NVCC_LVDS_2P5. The typical max power of VDDHIGH_IN is around 85mA, so this 85mA exceed your platform's 2p5 power rail's capability? If you really want to get the real max power of NVCC_LVDS_2P5, then you may need to measure the power consumption on our SabreSD board, remove r600 and connect a current meter, then run the max power test case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 06:21:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/NVCC-LVDS-2P5-current-consumption/m-p/257116#M24861</guid>
      <dc:creator>AnsonHuang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-15T06:21:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NVCC_LVDS_2P5 current consumption</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/NVCC-LVDS-2P5-current-consumption/m-p/257117#M24862</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Yongcai,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the response. I was hoping for a lower figure, but I can budget for the full 85mA for now. I will make the measurement when we get the board busy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gavin.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 08:40:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/NVCC-LVDS-2P5-current-consumption/m-p/257117#M24862</guid>
      <dc:creator>gavinjones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-15T08:40:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

