<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>i.MX ProcessorsのトピックRe: AN15075 Patch can't be applied</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/AN15075-Patch-can-t-be-applied/m-p/2410343#M246578</link>
    <description>Is there any change NXP will update the patch for Yocto Wrynose (with linux 6.18)?</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 07:11:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>oedze</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-09-02T07:11:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AN15075 Patch can't be applied</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/AN15075-Patch-can-t-be-applied/m-p/2410077#M246569</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The relativly new user manual&amp;nbsp;AN15075 metions the file&amp;nbsp;0001-add-AHAB-check-for-imx&lt;BR /&gt;remote-proc-process.patch&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Which i found in the&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;AN15075SW.zip.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This patch files applies the following 3 lines:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;+#ifdef CONFIG_IMX_REMOTEPROC_AHAB
+#include &amp;lt;linux/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.h&amp;gt;
+#include &amp;lt;linux/firmware/imx/se_fw_inc.h&amp;gt;
+#endif&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;to&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c from linux-imx&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;but tthe file linux/firmware/imx/se_fw_inc.h doesn't exist (anywhere on the internet)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And the file ele_base_msg is not placed at that location.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am working on the linux-imx lf-6.18.y branch&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://github.com/nxp-imx/linux-imx/tree/lf-6.18.y" target="_blank"&gt;https://github.com/nxp-imx/linux-imx/tree/lf-6.18.y&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I couldn't find it on the 6.6 or 6.12 either.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;To what version of linux-imx should this patch be applied?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;P.S. If you add the patch and disable&amp;nbsp;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;CONFIG_IMX_REMOTEPROC_AHAB&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;The linux-imx won't build either because some properties stopped existing because some of the code is guarded under a #ifdef but not all.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 10:22:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/AN15075-Patch-can-t-be-applied/m-p/2410077#M246569</guid>
      <dc:creator>oedze</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-01T10:22:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AN15075 Patch can't be applied</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/AN15075-Patch-can-t-be-applied/m-p/2410143#M246571</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Did some more digging:&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This patch seems to add these files:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2023-July/848851.html" target="_blank"&gt;[PATCH v4 6/7] firmware: imx: add driver for NXP EdgeLock Enclave&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But it was reapplied differently in this commit:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://github.com/nxp-imx/linux-imx/commit/0eff4025384aab9f93e9f8411e18dbcaac79ce54#diff-1498ef15b028ef9d8008cb848b61521a7fde0c4d234621585c77c6395e4072a5" target="_blank"&gt;LF-13910: firmware: imx: add driver for NXP EdgeLock Enclave · nxp-imx/linux-imx@0eff402&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 12:02:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/AN15075-Patch-can-t-be-applied/m-p/2410143#M246571</guid>
      <dc:creator>oedze</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-01T12:02:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AN15075 Patch can't be applied</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/AN15075-Patch-can-t-be-applied/m-p/2410339#M246577</link>
      <description>&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Apply AN15075SW’s kernel patch to&amp;nbsp;lf-6.6.36-2.1.0&amp;nbsp;/ BSP&amp;nbsp;lf-6.6.36&amp;nbsp;.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;$ git clone &lt;A href="https://github.com/nxp-imx/linux-imx.git" target="_blank"&gt;https://github.com/nxp-imx/linux-imx.git&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;$ git checkout -b lf-6.6.36-2.1.0 lf-6.6.36-2.1.0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Do not expect it to apply cleanly to&amp;nbsp;lf-6.18.y&amp;nbsp;; it must be forward-ported.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;If forward-porting, fix both the include paths and the Kconfig guards.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;Your PS is consistent with a partial guard bug: disabling&amp;nbsp;CONFIG_IMX_REMOTEPROC_AHAB&amp;nbsp;should leave the existing remoteproc path buildable, but the AN patch appears to leave some non-AHAB code dependent on definitions or fields introduced only inside&amp;nbsp;#ifdef CONFIG_IMX_REMOTEPROC_AHAB&amp;nbsp;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 07:08:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/AN15075-Patch-can-t-be-applied/m-p/2410339#M246577</guid>
      <dc:creator>yipingwang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-02T07:08:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AN15075 Patch can't be applied</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/AN15075-Patch-can-t-be-applied/m-p/2410343#M246578</link>
      <description>Is there any change NXP will update the patch for Yocto Wrynose (with linux 6.18)?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 07:11:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/AN15075-Patch-can-t-be-applied/m-p/2410343#M246578</guid>
      <dc:creator>oedze</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-02T07:11:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AN15075 Patch can't be applied</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/AN15075-Patch-can-t-be-applied/m-p/2410349#M246579</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The patch we implemented at that time was merely a proof of concept, and the software team did not agree to merge it into the upstream repository.&lt;BR /&gt;So it's just a reference implementation.&lt;BR /&gt;The subsequent porting was not continued.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 07:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/AN15075-Patch-can-t-be-applied/m-p/2410349#M246579</guid>
      <dc:creator>yipingwang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-02T07:37:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AN15075 Patch can't be applied</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/AN15075-Patch-can-t-be-applied/m-p/2412011#M246643</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is modifying the remoteproc code to use the ELE firmware still the recommended approach to enable AHAB on the second core?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 11:54:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/AN15075-Patch-can-t-be-applied/m-p/2412011#M246643</guid>
      <dc:creator>oedze</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-08T11:54:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AN15075 Patch can't be applied</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/AN15075-Patch-can-t-be-applied/m-p/2412183#M246649</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 01:23:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/AN15075-Patch-can-t-be-applied/m-p/2412183#M246649</guid>
      <dc:creator>yipingwang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-09T01:23:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

