<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>i.MX ProcessorsのトピックRe: PF53 variants package marking</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/PF53-variants-package-marking/m-p/2367114#M245272</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your interest in NXP Semiconductor products,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Top marking differentiates them, the heading should contain the Part Number&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PF53XX.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It would depend on the part type, if they are for manufacture or they are samples, they should be different though,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 20:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JosephAtNXP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-05-18T20:28:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PF53 variants package marking</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/PF53-variants-package-marking/m-p/2366868#M245265</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dears,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In one of our board we are using both the PF5301 (8A) and the PF5302 (15A) options of the component, is it possible to tell one component from the other from the package markings?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see no reference to the usage of different codes in the datasheet of the component, nor a general definition of the marking.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 10:46:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/PF53-variants-package-marking/m-p/2366868#M245265</guid>
      <dc:creator>marco_muratori</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-18T10:46:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PF53 variants package marking</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/PF53-variants-package-marking/m-p/2367114#M245272</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your interest in NXP Semiconductor products,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Top marking differentiates them, the heading should contain the Part Number&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PF53XX.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It would depend on the part type, if they are for manufacture or they are samples, they should be different though,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 20:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/PF53-variants-package-marking/m-p/2367114#M245272</guid>
      <dc:creator>JosephAtNXP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-18T20:28:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PF53 variants package marking</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/PF53-variants-package-marking/m-p/2369521#M245310</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your reply, unfortunately there seems to be no text differences over the two components.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the marking spec for these devices? I could not find any in the technical datasheet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 10:40:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/PF53-variants-package-marking/m-p/2369521#M245310</guid>
      <dc:creator>marco_muratori</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-21T10:40:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

