<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Feasibility of Upgrading from Nanbield to Scarthgap Yocto for Production – i.MX8QXP in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Feasibility-of-Upgrading-from-Nanbield-to-Scarthgap-Yocto-for/m-p/2146113#M239820</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi NXP Team,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are currently working with the &lt;STRONG&gt;i.MX8QXP&lt;/STRONG&gt; platform (imx8qxpc0mek) and have our Yocto setup based on the &lt;STRONG&gt;Nanbield&lt;/STRONG&gt; release.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As part of our roadmap planning, we would like to understand the &lt;STRONG&gt;feasibility of upgrading to the latest LTS Yocto release Scarthgap&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; for &lt;STRONG&gt;production use&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you kindly confirm:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whether &lt;STRONG&gt;Scarthgap&lt;/STRONG&gt; is &lt;STRONG&gt;recommended and stable&lt;/STRONG&gt; for production builds on the i.MX8QXP?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there &lt;STRONG&gt;any known compatibility issues&lt;/STRONG&gt; or feature gaps (e.g., with modules like display, BT,WiFi, USB-PD, GNSS, eSIM, IMU, power management, STR, etc.) that we should be aware of compared to Nanbield?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you foresee any &lt;STRONG&gt;migration concerns&lt;/STRONG&gt; regarding SCFW porting, Linux BSP layers, or peripheral validation?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is &lt;STRONG&gt;SCFW support and NXP maintained layers&lt;/STRONG&gt; (e.g., meta-freescale, meta-imx, meta-nxp-qt6-layer, etc.) already updated for Scarthgap for this SoC?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your input will help us assess the effort required for a potential LTS upgrade and ensure compatibility with our ongoing peripheral and thermal validation plans.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 09:53:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ram2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-04T09:53:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Feasibility of Upgrading from Nanbield to Scarthgap Yocto for Production – i.MX8QXP</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Feasibility-of-Upgrading-from-Nanbield-to-Scarthgap-Yocto-for/m-p/2146113#M239820</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi NXP Team,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are currently working with the &lt;STRONG&gt;i.MX8QXP&lt;/STRONG&gt; platform (imx8qxpc0mek) and have our Yocto setup based on the &lt;STRONG&gt;Nanbield&lt;/STRONG&gt; release.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As part of our roadmap planning, we would like to understand the &lt;STRONG&gt;feasibility of upgrading to the latest LTS Yocto release Scarthgap&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; for &lt;STRONG&gt;production use&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you kindly confirm:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whether &lt;STRONG&gt;Scarthgap&lt;/STRONG&gt; is &lt;STRONG&gt;recommended and stable&lt;/STRONG&gt; for production builds on the i.MX8QXP?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there &lt;STRONG&gt;any known compatibility issues&lt;/STRONG&gt; or feature gaps (e.g., with modules like display, BT,WiFi, USB-PD, GNSS, eSIM, IMU, power management, STR, etc.) that we should be aware of compared to Nanbield?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you foresee any &lt;STRONG&gt;migration concerns&lt;/STRONG&gt; regarding SCFW porting, Linux BSP layers, or peripheral validation?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is &lt;STRONG&gt;SCFW support and NXP maintained layers&lt;/STRONG&gt; (e.g., meta-freescale, meta-imx, meta-nxp-qt6-layer, etc.) already updated for Scarthgap for this SoC?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your input will help us assess the effort required for a potential LTS upgrade and ensure compatibility with our ongoing peripheral and thermal validation plans.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 09:53:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Feasibility-of-Upgrading-from-Nanbield-to-Scarthgap-Yocto-for/m-p/2146113#M239820</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ram2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-04T09:53:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Feasibility of Upgrading from Nanbield to Scarthgap Yocto for Production – i.MX8QXP</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Feasibility-of-Upgrading-from-Nanbield-to-Scarthgap-Yocto-for/m-p/2146235#M239828</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A1. Yes Scarthgap is LTS on NXP and yocto, You can find it on&amp;nbsp; 6.6.52 BSP:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.nxp.com/design/design-center/software/embedded-software/i-mx-software/embedded-linux-for-i-mx-applications-processors:IMXLINUX" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.nxp.com/design/design-center/software/embedded-software/i-mx-software/embedded-linux-for-i-mx-applications-processors:IMXLINUX&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A2. NXP does not support Nanbield. is not LTS&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A3. Yes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A4. For Scarthgap yes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 14:04:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Feasibility-of-Upgrading-from-Nanbield-to-Scarthgap-Yocto-for/m-p/2146235#M239828</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bio_TICFSL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-04T14:04:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

