https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX8MP-Get-unique-ID-to-set-FIELD-RETURN-UID/m-p/2051964#M234500 <P>Hello,</P><P>The i.MX8MP reference says the unique ID is split over several fuses, but specifically 0x420 seems a bit off. Is 0x420[10:0] leading, or is UNIQUE_ID[42:0] leading? If the former, where are the missing 31 bits?</P><P>Thanks in advance.</P> Wed, 26 Feb 2025 16:58:00 GMT Bayou 2025-02-26T16:58:00Z https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX8MP-Get-unique-ID-to-set-FIELD-RETURN-UID/m-p/2051964#M234500 <P>Hello,</P><P>The i.MX8MP reference says the unique ID is split over several fuses, but specifically 0x420 seems a bit off. Is 0x420[10:0] leading, or is UNIQUE_ID[42:0] leading? If the former, where are the missing 31 bits?</P><P>Thanks in advance.</P> Wed, 26 Feb 2025 16:58:00 GMT https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX8MP-Get-unique-ID-to-set-FIELD-RETURN-UID/m-p/2051964#M234500 Bayou 2025-02-26T16:58:00Z https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX8MP-Get-unique-ID-to-set-FIELD-RETURN-UID/m-p/2053115#M234556 <P>Hi,</P> <P>Thank you for your interest in NXP Semiconductor products,</P> <P>The 42:0 is the correct value, seems like they missed it and it's an error. But the correct value is 42:0.</P> <P>Regards</P> Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:22:29 GMT https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX8MP-Get-unique-ID-to-set-FIELD-RETURN-UID/m-p/2053115#M234556 JosephAtNXP 2025-02-27T16:22:29Z