<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>i.MX Processors中的主题 Re: DEK Blob generation for encrypted boot</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DEK-Blob-generation-for-encrypted-boot/m-p/2006607#M231519</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;BR /&gt;However, you do not seem to have understood the question.&lt;BR /&gt;It did not answer the question.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 05:10:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>spthx</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-12-04T05:10:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DEK Blob generation for encrypted boot</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DEK-Blob-generation-for-encrypted-boot/m-p/1994186#M230851</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to apply HAB (encrypted boot) to a product that uses i.MX8MN.&lt;BR /&gt;For encrypted boot, we need to generate a DEK Blob on the device side,&lt;BR /&gt;It is generated by calling dek_blob.pta in OP-TEE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have confirmed that using a DEK Blob generated with PRIBLOB=01 in CAAM, the device boots successfully from the encrypted image with the DEK Blob merged.&lt;BR /&gt;However, if a DEK Blob generated with PRIBLOB=11 is used, the boot fails.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For this reason, it seems that PRIBLOB cannot be set to 11 in order to generate Blobs that support encrypted boot when implementing the software update function.&lt;BR /&gt;However, it also seems that this setting is not recommended.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In view of the implementation of the software update function, could you please tell us about the best practice for DEK Blob generation?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 03:17:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DEK-Blob-generation-for-encrypted-boot/m-p/1994186#M230851</guid>
      <dc:creator>spthx</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-14T03:17:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DEK Blob generation for encrypted boot</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DEK-Blob-generation-for-encrypted-boot/m-p/2004026#M231340</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I reply back to you via system service email regarding the secure case.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Harvey&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 03:01:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DEK-Blob-generation-for-encrypted-boot/m-p/2004026#M231340</guid>
      <dc:creator>Harvey021</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-29T03:01:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DEK Blob generation for encrypted boot</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DEK-Blob-generation-for-encrypted-boot/m-p/2006607#M231519</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;BR /&gt;However, you do not seem to have understood the question.&lt;BR /&gt;It did not answer the question.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 05:10:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/DEK-Blob-generation-for-encrypted-boot/m-p/2006607#M231519</guid>
      <dc:creator>spthx</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-04T05:10:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

