<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic i.MX8M MINI not listed as Right i.MX Applications Processor for Your Embedded Linux Design in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX8M-MINI-not-listed-as-Right-i-MX-Applications-Processor-for/m-p/1906450#M226088</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The NXP document INDIOTAPPSMCBR , "Essential NXP Platforms For Linux:Choosing the Right i.MX Applications Processor for Your Embedded Linux Design" located at web URL:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://contact.nxp.com/IMXFORLINUXDESIGN" target="_blank"&gt;https://contact.nxp.com/IMXFORLINUXDESIGN&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;listed the i.MX8 family processors: i.MX8 ULP and&amp;nbsp; i.MX8M Nano Ultralite processors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, it does not list other much more capable i.MX8 family processors: i.M8M Mini or&amp;nbsp;i.M8M Plus. &amp;nbsp;I understand that not all processors may not be able to make the list and this document may be more for marketing flair to highlight select processors. However, I find it potentially misleading, especially the fact that evaluation kits are not available for 3 of the 6 processors. I would not consider that a good recommendation!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here are my questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Can you please explain why the i.M8M Mini and i.M8M Plus did not make the list?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Why are the i.M8M Mini and i.M8M Plus not considered the "Right i.MX Applications Processor for Your Embedded Linux Design" ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Are there plans to have update the&amp;nbsp;i.M8M Mini and i.M8M Plus to&amp;nbsp;fix numerous documented errata issues? If so, when?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:06:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dandroid4NXP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-07-11T16:06:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>i.MX8M MINI not listed as Right i.MX Applications Processor for Your Embedded Linux Design</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX8M-MINI-not-listed-as-Right-i-MX-Applications-Processor-for/m-p/1906450#M226088</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The NXP document INDIOTAPPSMCBR , "Essential NXP Platforms For Linux:Choosing the Right i.MX Applications Processor for Your Embedded Linux Design" located at web URL:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://contact.nxp.com/IMXFORLINUXDESIGN" target="_blank"&gt;https://contact.nxp.com/IMXFORLINUXDESIGN&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;listed the i.MX8 family processors: i.MX8 ULP and&amp;nbsp; i.MX8M Nano Ultralite processors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, it does not list other much more capable i.MX8 family processors: i.M8M Mini or&amp;nbsp;i.M8M Plus. &amp;nbsp;I understand that not all processors may not be able to make the list and this document may be more for marketing flair to highlight select processors. However, I find it potentially misleading, especially the fact that evaluation kits are not available for 3 of the 6 processors. I would not consider that a good recommendation!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here are my questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Can you please explain why the i.M8M Mini and i.M8M Plus did not make the list?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Why are the i.M8M Mini and i.M8M Plus not considered the "Right i.MX Applications Processor for Your Embedded Linux Design" ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Are there plans to have update the&amp;nbsp;i.M8M Mini and i.M8M Plus to&amp;nbsp;fix numerous documented errata issues? If so, when?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:06:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX8M-MINI-not-listed-as-Right-i-MX-Applications-Processor-for/m-p/1906450#M226088</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dandroid4NXP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-11T16:06:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

