i.MX ProcessorsのトピックRe: GPIO_EMC_39

GPIO_EMC_39

sapirbuz — Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:09:57 GMT

Hello,

We are using the MIMXRT1051CVL5B in our design.

We are encountering an issue with the B7 pin (GPIO_EMC_39).

We have configured this signal as an input, but when we press the POR button, this pin is driving our external circuit low (we have connected a '1' push-pull configuration to that pin).

Could you please assist us in understanding why this issue is occurring and how we can prevent the MCU from driving it low?

Re: GPIO_EMC_39

EdwinHz — Thu, 17 Aug 2023 23:31:52 GMT

Hi @sapirbuz,

As mentioned on the RM, on section "11.6.164 SW_PAD_CTL_PAD_GPIO_EMC_39 SW PAD Control Register (IOMUXC_SW_PAD_CTL_PAD_GPIO_EMC_39)" bit field "Pull Up / Down Config. Field" is initialized to a "00 PUS_0_100K_Ohm_Pull_Down — 100K Ohm Pull Down" after reset. This is why you are seeing the pin low after a POR.

BR,
Edwin.

Re: GPIO_EMC_39

sapirbuz — Tue, 22 Aug 2023 08:15:27 GMT

Hi,

IOMUXC_SW_PAD_CTL_PAD_GPIO_EMC_41 is defined the same as IOMUXC_SW_PAD_CTL_PAD_GPIO_EMC_39, but it isn't driven low while POR.

How can we prevent IOMUXC_SW_PAD_CTL_PAD_GPIO_EMC_39 from driving our signal to low after POR?

Re: GPIO_EMC_39

EdwinHz — Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:13:00 GMT

Hi @sapirbuz,

Are you currently using the Device Configuration Data (DCD) to set up GPIO_EMC_39? i.e.:

 /* #1.90, command: write_value, address: IOMUXC_SW_PAD_CTL_PAD_GPIO_EMC_39, value: 0x110F9, size: 4 */
0x40, 0x1F, 0x82, 0xA0, 0x00, 0x01, 0x10, 0xF9,

BR,
Edwin.

Re: GPIO_EMC_39

sapirbuz — Wed, 06 Sep 2023 12:46:58 GMT

yes, we are using that CFG

Re: GPIO_EMC_39

EdwinHz — Thu, 07 Sep 2023 18:09:57 GMT

Hi @sapirbuz,

This is most likely why this specific pin is being changed upon boot. If you don't use this pin to operate an external memory upon boot, then you should be able to remove it, and the pin will not be configured upon boot.

BR,
Edwin.

Re: GPIO_EMC_39

sapirbuz — Sun, 10 Sep 2023 12:26:09 GMT

Hi,

we removed the following:

/* #1.90, command: write_value, address: IOMUXC_SW_PAD_CTL_PAD_GPIO_EMC_39, value: 0x110F9, size: 4 */
0x40, 0x1F, 0x82, 0xA0, 0x00, 0x01, 0x10, 0xF9,

and the issue wasn't solved

Re: GPIO_EMC_39

sapirbuz — Wed, 13 Sep 2023 13:14:40 GMT

Kindly reminder

Re: GPIO_EMC_39

EdwinHz — Mon, 18 Sep 2023 20:18:55 GMT

Hi @sapirbuz,

Could you please share the external circuit that you are connecting to the pad? Perhaps the issue lies in the hardware configuration of the pin, rather than the software configuration.

BR,
Edwin.

Re: GPIO_EMC_39

sapirbuz — Tue, 19 Sep 2023 10:39:36 GMT

hi,

10k pull up to 3.3V rail, that all

Re: GPIO_EMC_39

EdwinHz — Fri, 22 Sep 2023 23:08:03 GMT

Hi @sapirbuz,

This issue is most likely caused by conflicts of the DQS functionality of this pad. Could you please share if you are using SEMC functionality to handle an external memory? What type of memory would that be? Also, please check the GPIO/fuse BOOT_CFG [10] (depending on if there is GPIO override or not). Is the "DQS pin pad enablement" on 1 or 0?

Re: GPIO_EMC_39

sapirbuz — Wed, 27 Sep 2023 13:13:52 GMT

Hi,

SEMC is used, and the external memory is NOR secondary, as in Picture 1.

BOOT_CFG[10] is configured as input GPIO, PU and keeper are defined as no init.

the DQS pins were left unconnected by HW.

At the beginning, DQS pins were enabled, but the MCU couldn't read the data from the boot EEPROM; so we disabled those pins.

Picture 1:

Re: GPIO_EMC_39

EdwinHz — Wed, 11 Oct 2023 18:20:19 GMT

Hi @sapirbuz,

I am still looking into this issue. Could you please double check that the BOOT_CFG[10] fuse is still on 0 (unburned)?

It could be an issue that, during booting, the fuse selection of this pin is affecting its functionality, so we need to make sure the DQS fuse is not enabled on fuses for this pad.