<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic i.MX RT1170 Execute-in-Pace (XIP) Performance in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX-RT1170-Execute-in-Pace-XIP-Performance/m-p/1633350#M204172</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;How does the performance of "Execute-in-Place (XIP)" from a QSPI NOR flash device compare to executing directly from internal SRAM?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For reference, I am using the RT1170_EVK development platform with the Zephyr RTOS. My application will be too large to fit into the ITCM/DTCM memories - so, I'd like to know if I should leverage a bootloader to move the application from flash to the internal SRAM before executing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 18:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jtaylor24</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-04-13T18:07:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>i.MX RT1170 Execute-in-Pace (XIP) Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX-RT1170-Execute-in-Pace-XIP-Performance/m-p/1633350#M204172</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How does the performance of "Execute-in-Place (XIP)" from a QSPI NOR flash device compare to executing directly from internal SRAM?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For reference, I am using the RT1170_EVK development platform with the Zephyr RTOS. My application will be too large to fit into the ITCM/DTCM memories - so, I'd like to know if I should leverage a bootloader to move the application from flash to the internal SRAM before executing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 18:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX-RT1170-Execute-in-Pace-XIP-Performance/m-p/1633350#M204172</guid>
      <dc:creator>jtaylor24</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-13T18:07:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: i.MX RT1170 Execute-in-Pace (XIP) Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX-RT1170-Execute-in-Pace-XIP-Performance/m-p/1636600#M204484</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/215797"&gt;@jtaylor24&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The performance is generally the best when when running from internal ITC RAM, which is next to the core. Also performance is dependent to the application.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/application-note/AN12437.pdf?_gl=1*gdz5kc*_ga*MjkyNjA3MDc1LjE2ODE5MjMzODM.*_ga_WM5LE0KMSH*MTY4MTkzNTgxOC40LjEuMTY4MTkzODQ2Ny4wLjAuMA.." target="_self"&gt;AN12437&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/application-note/AN12437.pdf?_gl=1*gdz5kc*_ga*MjkyNjA3MDc1LjE2ODE5MjMzODM.*_ga_WM5LE0KMSH*MTY4MTkzNTgxOC40LjEuMTY4MTkzODQ2Ny4wLjAuMA.." target="_self"&gt;i.MX RT Series Performance Optimization&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;EM&gt;section&amp;nbsp; 3.3 Performance comparison on different memory&lt;/EM&gt; gives an example for this topic.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;All the best&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Diego&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 21:23:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/i-MX-RT1170-Execute-in-Pace-XIP-Performance/m-p/1636600#M204484</guid>
      <dc:creator>diego_charles</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-19T21:23:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

