<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>i.MX ProcessorsのトピックDifferences in u-boot sources</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Differences-in-u-boot-sources/m-p/241944#M20302</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello guys !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need a feature of u-boot (fat write precisely) which is present only in newer versions of u-boot, such as the one present in u-boot-imx of freescale's git. Nevertheless, when I took a look at this sources, I saw that there were lots of differences with u-boot sources present in LTIB currently.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For instance, the flag CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT which I currently use to enable HAB is not even present in the new u-boot. So I could easily apply patches to enable fat write in my old u-boot, but I'm afraid of what sources will come with newer versions of the BSP. Will the HAB feature will be added to u-boot-imx or will we have to do it by ourself ? Will a merge take place between both versions ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance ! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:16:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AlbertT</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-16T08:16:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Differences in u-boot sources</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Differences-in-u-boot-sources/m-p/241944#M20302</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello guys !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need a feature of u-boot (fat write precisely) which is present only in newer versions of u-boot, such as the one present in u-boot-imx of freescale's git. Nevertheless, when I took a look at this sources, I saw that there were lots of differences with u-boot sources present in LTIB currently.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For instance, the flag CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT which I currently use to enable HAB is not even present in the new u-boot. So I could easily apply patches to enable fat write in my old u-boot, but I'm afraid of what sources will come with newer versions of the BSP. Will the HAB feature will be added to u-boot-imx or will we have to do it by ourself ? Will a merge take place between both versions ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance ! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:16:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Differences-in-u-boot-sources/m-p/241944#M20302</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlbertT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-16T08:16:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Differences in u-boot sources</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Differences-in-u-boot-sources/m-p/241945#M20303</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would not expect a formal merge of old/new u-boot version.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you tried the mainline u-boot? I´m not sure if they have the security feature, but maybe it´s easier to be merged. And you can share your work with u-boot community (and get help from them)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 12:26:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Differences-in-u-boot-sources/m-p/241945#M20303</guid>
      <dc:creator>daiane_angolini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-24T12:26:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

