<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>i.MX Processors中的主题 Re: Secure Boot iMXM Mini two boards, different behavior</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Secure-Boot-iMXM-Mini-two-boards-different-behavior/m-p/1575213#M199273</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for responding. The issue was that the CSF.bin file was constructed differently and incorrectly. Once this was corrected, both cards booted as expected.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 13:13:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jimtaylor-vertiv</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-12-28T13:13:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Secure Boot iMXM Mini two boards, different behavior</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Secure-Boot-iMXM-Mini-two-boards-different-behavior/m-p/1571346#M198887</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I programmed the fuses for an iMX8M Mini board, loaded a signed image and watched it boot without HAB errors. After that I programmed the security bit so that the board would not boot without a valid image. The board continued to boot just fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I programmed the fuse on a second board the same way I programmed them on the first board. I loaded the same image and I am seeing HAB errors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I then went into u-boot on both boards and used the "fuse read" command to read the value of the fuses in Banks 6 and 7. The fuses are identical. The fuses in Banks 1 3 and 2 2 are also identical.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have an idea of where I should start looking?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 19:18:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Secure-Boot-iMXM-Mini-two-boards-different-behavior/m-p/1571346#M198887</guid>
      <dc:creator>jimtaylor-vertiv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-16T19:18:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Secure Boot iMXM Mini two boards, different behavior</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Secure-Boot-iMXM-Mini-two-boards-different-behavior/m-p/1574628#M199214</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/192089"&gt;@jimtaylor-vertiv&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The behavior you are describing is strange!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To debug more on the same, provide me with full logs, including the HAB error.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Dhruvit.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2022 13:39:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Secure-Boot-iMXM-Mini-two-boards-different-behavior/m-p/1574628#M199214</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dhruvit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-26T13:39:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Secure Boot iMXM Mini two boards, different behavior</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Secure-Boot-iMXM-Mini-two-boards-different-behavior/m-p/1575213#M199273</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for responding. The issue was that the CSF.bin file was constructed differently and incorrectly. Once this was corrected, both cards booted as expected.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 13:13:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Secure-Boot-iMXM-Mini-two-boards-different-behavior/m-p/1575213#M199273</guid>
      <dc:creator>jimtaylor-vertiv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-28T13:13:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

