<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic IMX8M mini - MotionMark1.2 GPU performance in Chromium in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX8M-mini-MotionMark1-2-GPU-performance-in-Chromium/m-p/1447840#M189587</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I got a really generic question about the maximum results of MotionMark1.2 test could be achieved on IMX 8M Mini. I have been performing tests with custom made board using glmark2-es2 on top of Weston (9.0.0) and results are visually smooth and looks well. When VSync is forced I see all tests can reach 60fps or 30fps ( display &lt;A href="mailto:1920x1080@60" target="_blank"&gt;1920x1080@60&lt;/A&gt;) and looks really good. However when running MotionMark tests:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://browserbench.org/MotionMark1.2/" target="_blank"&gt;MotionMark 1.2 (browserbench.org)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can reach final results in range of ~1.1 (MotionMark states that test is launched for 'Large screen').. and visually those results are far from what I saw in glmark2-es. Chromium states that browser is supporting GPU, and I can see all the renderings on the screen. I am using distro based on NXP's meta with imx-gpu-viv 6.4.3 driver. I have launched only chromium-ozone-wayland on top of weston (kiosk-shell). No other 'heavy' services running in background.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is what would be the results we could expect from IMX8M mini + 2GB RAM? Could someone please share results from MotionMark1.2? I could then at least understand what IMX8 mini shall be capable to reach with this test.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 12:31:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CharrB</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-04-22T12:31:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IMX8M mini - MotionMark1.2 GPU performance in Chromium</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX8M-mini-MotionMark1-2-GPU-performance-in-Chromium/m-p/1447840#M189587</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I got a really generic question about the maximum results of MotionMark1.2 test could be achieved on IMX 8M Mini. I have been performing tests with custom made board using glmark2-es2 on top of Weston (9.0.0) and results are visually smooth and looks well. When VSync is forced I see all tests can reach 60fps or 30fps ( display &lt;A href="mailto:1920x1080@60" target="_blank"&gt;1920x1080@60&lt;/A&gt;) and looks really good. However when running MotionMark tests:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://browserbench.org/MotionMark1.2/" target="_blank"&gt;MotionMark 1.2 (browserbench.org)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can reach final results in range of ~1.1 (MotionMark states that test is launched for 'Large screen').. and visually those results are far from what I saw in glmark2-es. Chromium states that browser is supporting GPU, and I can see all the renderings on the screen. I am using distro based on NXP's meta with imx-gpu-viv 6.4.3 driver. I have launched only chromium-ozone-wayland on top of weston (kiosk-shell). No other 'heavy' services running in background.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is what would be the results we could expect from IMX8M mini + 2GB RAM? Could someone please share results from MotionMark1.2? I could then at least understand what IMX8 mini shall be capable to reach with this test.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 12:31:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/IMX8M-mini-MotionMark1-2-GPU-performance-in-Chromium/m-p/1447840#M189587</guid>
      <dc:creator>CharrB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-22T12:31:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

