<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic The trace-cmd report do not show the function name in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/The-trace-cmd-report-do-not-show-the-function-name/m-p/1373260#M183198</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I used the following command to trace the kernel on the i.MX8MM board.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;$&amp;nbsp;trace-cmd record -p function_graph ls&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;$&amp;nbsp;trace-cmd report&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;but I saw the following result just show the address instead of the function name.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714272: funcgraph_exit: ! 110.375 us | }&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714274: funcgraph_entry: 1.375 us | ffff0000082e37f8();&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714281: funcgraph_exit: ! 128.750 us | }&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714283: funcgraph_entry: | ffff0000082e5508() {&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714286: funcgraph_entry: 1.500 us | ffff0000082e4a0c();&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714291: funcgraph_entry: | ffff0000082e4470() {&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714294: funcgraph_entry: | ffff0000082c5adc() {&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714297: funcgraph_entry: 1.375 us | ffff0000082c5a58();&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714304: funcgraph_exit: 6.750 us | }&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714305: funcgraph_entry: | ffff0000082f0444() {&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714308: funcgraph_entry: | ffff0000082f03a8() {&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714311: funcgraph_entry: | ffff0000082f0244() {&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714313: funcgraph_entry: 1.000 us | ffff00000815f7bc();&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714318: funcgraph_entry: 0.875 us | ffff00000815f9f8();&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714324: funcgraph_exit: + 10.250 us | }&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714326: funcgraph_exit: + 15.750 us | }&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714329: funcgraph_exit: + 21.250 us | }&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;May I know how to show the exact function name on the trace-cmd result?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 07:53:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>wenhungyang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-11-18T07:53:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>The trace-cmd report do not show the function name</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/The-trace-cmd-report-do-not-show-the-function-name/m-p/1373260#M183198</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I used the following command to trace the kernel on the i.MX8MM board.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;$&amp;nbsp;trace-cmd record -p function_graph ls&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;$&amp;nbsp;trace-cmd report&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;but I saw the following result just show the address instead of the function name.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714272: funcgraph_exit: ! 110.375 us | }&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714274: funcgraph_entry: 1.375 us | ffff0000082e37f8();&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714281: funcgraph_exit: ! 128.750 us | }&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714283: funcgraph_entry: | ffff0000082e5508() {&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714286: funcgraph_entry: 1.500 us | ffff0000082e4a0c();&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714291: funcgraph_entry: | ffff0000082e4470() {&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714294: funcgraph_entry: | ffff0000082c5adc() {&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714297: funcgraph_entry: 1.375 us | ffff0000082c5a58();&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714304: funcgraph_exit: 6.750 us | }&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714305: funcgraph_entry: | ffff0000082f0444() {&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714308: funcgraph_entry: | ffff0000082f03a8() {&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714311: funcgraph_entry: | ffff0000082f0244() {&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714313: funcgraph_entry: 1.000 us | ffff00000815f7bc();&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714318: funcgraph_entry: 0.875 us | ffff00000815f9f8();&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714324: funcgraph_exit: + 10.250 us | }&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714326: funcgraph_exit: + 15.750 us | }&lt;BR /&gt;MtpServer-4877 [000] 1704.714329: funcgraph_exit: + 21.250 us | }&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;May I know how to show the exact function name on the trace-cmd result?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 07:53:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/The-trace-cmd-report-do-not-show-the-function-name/m-p/1373260#M183198</guid>
      <dc:creator>wenhungyang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-18T07:53:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

