<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>i.MX ProcessorsのトピックRe: imx8 Mini quad lite: flexspi interface with fpga</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx8-Mini-quad-lite-flexspi-interface-with-fpga/m-p/1354052#M181390</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Elena&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;Have you already implemented a similar solution?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;sorry NXP has not such reference design or ready software solutions, for additional&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;help may be recommended to proceed with&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://contact.nxp.com/new-prof-svcs-sw-tech" target="_blank"&gt;https://contact.nxp.com/new-prof-svcs-sw-tech&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:34:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-10-12T08:34:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>imx8 Mini quad lite: flexspi interface with fpga</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx8-Mini-quad-lite-flexspi-interface-with-fpga/m-p/1353509#M181356</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everybody,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we are studying imx8 M Mini Quad Lite for a new implementation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We want to use FlexSPI in memory mapped interface with a FPGA.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our problem is that our FPGA could spend more time to response that the wait state of the imx8M.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there anyone that has solved this problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;best regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:42:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx8-Mini-quad-lite-flexspi-interface-with-fpga/m-p/1353509#M181356</guid>
      <dc:creator>VISINE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-11T11:42:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: imx8 Mini quad lite: flexspi interface with fpga</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx8-Mini-quad-lite-flexspi-interface-with-fpga/m-p/1353971#M181384</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Elena&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;Our problem is that our FPGA could spend more time to response that the wait state of the imx8M.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;one can try to access fpga twice, it will give fpga opportunity to prepare valid data for second access.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Other alternative: during access on some address(for example 0800_0000) fpga prepares valid data for next address&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(0800_0004), e.t.c.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 07:24:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx8-Mini-quad-lite-flexspi-interface-with-fpga/m-p/1353971#M181384</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-12T07:24:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: imx8 Mini quad lite: flexspi interface with fpga</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx8-Mini-quad-lite-flexspi-interface-with-fpga/m-p/1353999#M181386</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/37066"&gt;@igorpadykov&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for your answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But how can we realize that the answer receveid by the micro is wrong or incompleted or some timeout has occurred in the micro?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does the micro go in exception?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps, Have you already implemented a similar solution?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Elena&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 07:47:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx8-Mini-quad-lite-flexspi-interface-with-fpga/m-p/1353999#M181386</guid>
      <dc:creator>VISINE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-12T07:47:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: imx8 Mini quad lite: flexspi interface with fpga</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx8-Mini-quad-lite-flexspi-interface-with-fpga/m-p/1354052#M181390</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Elena&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;Have you already implemented a similar solution?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;sorry NXP has not such reference design or ready software solutions, for additional&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;help may be recommended to proceed with&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://contact.nxp.com/new-prof-svcs-sw-tech" target="_blank"&gt;https://contact.nxp.com/new-prof-svcs-sw-tech&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:34:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/imx8-Mini-quad-lite-flexspi-interface-with-fpga/m-p/1354052#M181390</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-12T08:34:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

