<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>i.MX ProcessorsのトピックRe: Serial Download Protocol (SDP) security</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Serial-Download-Protocol-SDP-security/m-p/1343034#M180376</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/167087"&gt;@ceggers&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Yes,&amp;nbsp; it is safe to leave the SDP protocol enabled on a secure device, &lt;BR /&gt;assuming ERR01087is fixed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Yuri.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 05:21:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-09-21T05:21:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Serial Download Protocol (SDP) security</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Serial-Download-Protocol-SDP-security/m-p/1342624#M180345</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;IMX6ULL.pdf states on page 314 (Device Configuration Data, Write data command):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;If any of the target addresses do not lie within the allowed&lt;BR /&gt;region, none of the values are written. The list of allowable&lt;BR /&gt;blocks and target addresses for the chip are provided below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="ceggers_0-1632120703192.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/156490i031ABBDDB1CC225F/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="ceggers_0-1632120703192.png" alt="ceggers_0-1632120703192.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Page 322 describes the &lt;STRONG&gt;SDP&lt;/STRONG&gt; protocol. My expectation is, that the "address white list" for the &lt;STRONG&gt;DCD&lt;/STRONG&gt; commands must also apply for the SDP commands. But I didn't find this on the documentation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Q:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Is it save to leave the SDP protocol enabled on a secure device (assuming a HAB version where ERR01087 has been fixed)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 06:57:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Serial-Download-Protocol-SDP-security/m-p/1342624#M180345</guid>
      <dc:creator>ceggers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-20T06:57:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Serial Download Protocol (SDP) security</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Serial-Download-Protocol-SDP-security/m-p/1343034#M180376</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/167087"&gt;@ceggers&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Yes,&amp;nbsp; it is safe to leave the SDP protocol enabled on a secure device, &lt;BR /&gt;assuming ERR01087is fixed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Yuri.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 05:21:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Serial-Download-Protocol-SDP-security/m-p/1343034#M180376</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-21T05:21:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

