<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Device tree  compatibility between iMX6ULL and iMX6ULZ in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Device-tree-compatibility-between-iMX6ULL-and-iMX6ULZ/m-p/1334530#M179532</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our iMX6 customization development was based on iMX6 EVK main board revision 700-28616 REV A1, SCH-28616 REV C2, MCU board revision 700-29364 REV A, SCH-29364 REA, the EVK processor is MCIMX6Y2DVM09AA of iMX6ULL, but we purchased MCIMX6Z0DVM09AB which is iMX6ULZ, the device tree is based on available imx6ullevk.conf and imx6ull-14x14-evk.dtb at time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NXP developers have since added imx6ulz-14x14-evk.conf and imx6ulz-14x14-evk.dtb to meta-freescale for u-boot and kernel 5, what is the subtle device tree compatibility difference between imx6ullevk.conf, imx6ull-14x14-evk.dtb and imx6ulz-14x14-evk.conf,&amp;nbsp; imx6ulz-14x14-evk.dtb? Which one should be used?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;jh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 05:14:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jupiter_hce</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-09-03T05:14:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Device tree  compatibility between iMX6ULL and iMX6ULZ</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Device-tree-compatibility-between-iMX6ULL-and-iMX6ULZ/m-p/1334530#M179532</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our iMX6 customization development was based on iMX6 EVK main board revision 700-28616 REV A1, SCH-28616 REV C2, MCU board revision 700-29364 REV A, SCH-29364 REA, the EVK processor is MCIMX6Y2DVM09AA of iMX6ULL, but we purchased MCIMX6Z0DVM09AB which is iMX6ULZ, the device tree is based on available imx6ullevk.conf and imx6ull-14x14-evk.dtb at time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NXP developers have since added imx6ulz-14x14-evk.conf and imx6ulz-14x14-evk.dtb to meta-freescale for u-boot and kernel 5, what is the subtle device tree compatibility difference between imx6ullevk.conf, imx6ull-14x14-evk.dtb and imx6ulz-14x14-evk.conf,&amp;nbsp; imx6ulz-14x14-evk.dtb? Which one should be used?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;jh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 05:14:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Device-tree-compatibility-between-iMX6ULL-and-iMX6ULZ/m-p/1334530#M179532</guid>
      <dc:creator>jupiter_hce</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-03T05:14:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Device tree  compatibility between iMX6ULL and iMX6ULZ</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Device-tree-compatibility-between-iMX6ULL-and-iMX6ULZ/m-p/1334614#M179535</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Jupiter&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;for i.MX6ULZ imx6ulz-14x14-evk.conf, imx6ulz-14x14-evk.dtb should be used,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;difference between i.MX6ULL and i.MX6ULZ is described in AN12264&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A id="relatedDocsClick_5" href="https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/nxp/application-notes/AN12264.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;i.MX 6ULZ Migration Guide&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 06:46:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Device-tree-compatibility-between-iMX6ULL-and-iMX6ULZ/m-p/1334614#M179535</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-03T06:46:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

