<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>i.MX ProcessorsのトピックRe: Tamper detection implementation in i.MX8X processor</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Tamper-detection-implementation-in-i-MX8X-processor/m-p/1231350#M169538</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi puneethkumar&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;this information can be found in&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A id="relatedDocsClick_1" href="https://www.nxp.com/webapp/sps/download/mod_download.jsp?colCode=IMX8QXPSRM&amp;amp;appType=moderatedWithoutFAE" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Security Reference Manual for i.MX8DualX/8DualXPlus/8QuadXPlus Application Processors&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2021 07:15:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-16T07:15:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Tamper detection implementation in i.MX8X processor</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Tamper-detection-implementation-in-i-MX8X-processor/m-p/1231312#M169535</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am planning to implement a tamper detection in my system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone send reference where we can understand what is the difference between active &amp;amp; passive tamper detection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have planned to use only two tamper pins for the detection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SNVS_Tamper_In &amp;amp; SNVS_Tamper_Out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will use a 3 pin header - through my enclosure i will short the Tamper in &amp;amp; Tamper out pins, if anyone removes the enclosure that time the connection between tamper in &amp;amp; tamper out pins will be removed, so that we can identify if tamper is happened.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let me know whether the implementation method is proper or not&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2021 05:06:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Tamper-detection-implementation-in-i-MX8X-processor/m-p/1231312#M169535</guid>
      <dc:creator>puneethkumar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-16T05:06:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Tamper detection implementation in i.MX8X processor</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Tamper-detection-implementation-in-i-MX8X-processor/m-p/1231350#M169538</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi puneethkumar&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;this information can be found in&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A id="relatedDocsClick_1" href="https://www.nxp.com/webapp/sps/download/mod_download.jsp?colCode=IMX8QXPSRM&amp;amp;appType=moderatedWithoutFAE" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Security Reference Manual for i.MX8DualX/8DualXPlus/8QuadXPlus Application Processors&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2021 07:15:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Tamper-detection-implementation-in-i-MX8X-processor/m-p/1231350#M169538</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-16T07:15:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

