<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Pin mux discrepancy in IMX8DQXPRM in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Pin-mux-discrepancy-in-IMX8DQXPRM/m-p/1209701#M167554</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;found some&amp;nbsp;discrepancy in IMX8DQXPRM pdf:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;9.2.5.1.147 CSI_D00 (CSI_D00)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mux_mode&lt;BR /&gt;000b - CI_PI_CSI_D&lt;STRONG&gt;02&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;010b - ADMA_SAI0_RXC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;9.2.5.1.148 CSI_D01 (CSI_D01)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mux_mode&lt;BR /&gt;000b - CI_PI_CSI_D&lt;STRONG&gt;03&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;010b - ADMA_SAI0_RXD&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For CSI_D00 - pin mux description is for&amp;nbsp;CI_PI_CSI_D&lt;STRONG&gt;02,&lt;/STRONG&gt; for&amp;nbsp;CSI_D01 -&amp;nbsp;pin mux description is for&amp;nbsp;CI_PI_CSI_D&lt;STRONG&gt;03, etc.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;Same issue is for all CSI_D00-CSI_D07.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:26:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>maximpodberezni</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-01-11T14:26:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pin mux discrepancy in IMX8DQXPRM</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Pin-mux-discrepancy-in-IMX8DQXPRM/m-p/1209701#M167554</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;found some&amp;nbsp;discrepancy in IMX8DQXPRM pdf:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;9.2.5.1.147 CSI_D00 (CSI_D00)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mux_mode&lt;BR /&gt;000b - CI_PI_CSI_D&lt;STRONG&gt;02&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;010b - ADMA_SAI0_RXC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;9.2.5.1.148 CSI_D01 (CSI_D01)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mux_mode&lt;BR /&gt;000b - CI_PI_CSI_D&lt;STRONG&gt;03&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;010b - ADMA_SAI0_RXD&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For CSI_D00 - pin mux description is for&amp;nbsp;CI_PI_CSI_D&lt;STRONG&gt;02,&lt;/STRONG&gt; for&amp;nbsp;CSI_D01 -&amp;nbsp;pin mux description is for&amp;nbsp;CI_PI_CSI_D&lt;STRONG&gt;03, etc.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;Same issue is for all CSI_D00-CSI_D07.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:26:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/Pin-mux-discrepancy-in-IMX8DQXPRM/m-p/1209701#M167554</guid>
      <dc:creator>maximpodberezni</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-11T14:26:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

