<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FLEXCAN fails to probe (i.mx6sx) in i.MX Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/FLEXCAN-fails-to-probe-i-mx6sx/m-p/1175711#M164286</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="lia-message-body lia-component-message-view-widget-body lia-component-body-signature-highlight-escalation lia-component-message-view-widget-body-signature-highlight-escalation"&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-body-content"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi igor,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply. I don't see any remarkable difference in the referenced dts file. I neither see anything remarkable in the u-boot - they only configure the pads, that shouldn't play any role, right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've cut the dts node to the minimum, i.e.:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&amp;amp;flexcan1 {&lt;BR /&gt;status = "okay";&lt;BR /&gt;};&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hence only enabling the node as defined in imx6sx.dtsi. Still does not work. The same behaviour for flexcan2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea why the FLEXCAN_MCR_LPM_ACK flag is not asserted?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Petr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:12:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kubiznak_petr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-30T07:12:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FLEXCAN fails to probe (i.mx6sx)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/FLEXCAN-fails-to-probe-i-mx6sx/m-p/1174577#M164191</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm having an issue with FLEXCAN on i.mx6sx. It fails to probe during Linux bootup (linux-fslc v4.1-2.0.x).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In dts, I just enable the peripheral:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&amp;amp;flexcan1 {&lt;BR /&gt;pinctrl-names = "default";&lt;BR /&gt;pinctrl-0 = &amp;lt;&amp;amp;pinctrl_flexcan1_1&amp;gt;;&lt;BR /&gt;status = "okay";&lt;BR /&gt;};&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;pinctrl_flexcan1_1: flexcan1grp_1 {&lt;BR /&gt;fsl,pins = &amp;lt;&lt;BR /&gt;MX6SX_PAD_SD3_DATA5__CAN1_TX 0x1b0b0&lt;BR /&gt;MX6SX_PAD_SD3_DATA7__CAN1_RX 0x1b0b0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;;&lt;BR /&gt;};&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kernel boot log:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;CAN device driver interface&lt;BR /&gt;2090000.can supply xceiver not found, using dummy regulator&lt;BR /&gt;flexcan 2090000.can: registering netdev failed&lt;BR /&gt;flexcan: probe of 2090000.can failed with error -110&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After debugging the driver, I found &lt;SPAN&gt;register_flexcandev() &lt;/SPAN&gt;enables the two clocks and calls &lt;SPAN&gt;flexcan_chip_disable()&lt;/SPAN&gt; which timeouts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess I'm missing some stupid little thing here. Does anybody have a suggestion what's wrong?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:29:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/FLEXCAN-fails-to-probe-i-mx6sx/m-p/1174577#M164191</guid>
      <dc:creator>kubiznak_petr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-28T14:29:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FLEXCAN fails to probe (i.mx6sx)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/FLEXCAN-fails-to-probe-i-mx6sx/m-p/1174912#M164209</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi kubiznak_petr&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;for community linux "linux-fslc" one can look at boundary devices settings in&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/boundarydevices/linux-imx6/blob/boundary-imx_4.1.15_2.0.0_ga/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx-nitrogen6sx.dts" target="_blank"&gt;https://github.com/boundarydevices/linux-imx6/blob/boundary-imx_4.1.15_2.0.0_ga/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx-nitrogen6sx.dts&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/boundarydevices/u-boot-imx6/tree/boundary-v2016.03/board/boundary/nitrogen6sx" target="_blank"&gt;https://github.com/boundarydevices/u-boot-imx6/tree/boundary-v2016.03/board/boundary/nitrogen6sx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 01:13:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/FLEXCAN-fails-to-probe-i-mx6sx/m-p/1174912#M164209</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-29T01:13:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FLEXCAN fails to probe (i.mx6sx)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/FLEXCAN-fails-to-probe-i-mx6sx/m-p/1175708#M164285</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;dummy&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:13:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/FLEXCAN-fails-to-probe-i-mx6sx/m-p/1175708#M164285</guid>
      <dc:creator>kubiznak_petr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-30T07:13:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FLEXCAN fails to probe (i.mx6sx)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/FLEXCAN-fails-to-probe-i-mx6sx/m-p/1175711#M164286</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="lia-message-body lia-component-message-view-widget-body lia-component-body-signature-highlight-escalation lia-component-message-view-widget-body-signature-highlight-escalation"&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-body-content"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi igor,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply. I don't see any remarkable difference in the referenced dts file. I neither see anything remarkable in the u-boot - they only configure the pads, that shouldn't play any role, right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've cut the dts node to the minimum, i.e.:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&amp;amp;flexcan1 {&lt;BR /&gt;status = "okay";&lt;BR /&gt;};&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hence only enabling the node as defined in imx6sx.dtsi. Still does not work. The same behaviour for flexcan2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea why the FLEXCAN_MCR_LPM_ACK flag is not asserted?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Petr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:12:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/FLEXCAN-fails-to-probe-i-mx6sx/m-p/1175711#M164286</guid>
      <dc:creator>kubiznak_petr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-30T07:12:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FLEXCAN fails to probe (i.mx6sx)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/FLEXCAN-fails-to-probe-i-mx6sx/m-p/1175884#M164309</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Petr&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;one can try to debug in probe() function using&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;AN4553 Using Open Source Debugging Tools for Linux on i.MX Processors&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/application-note/AN4553.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/application-note/AN4553.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;BR /&gt;igor&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:14:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/i-MX-Processors/FLEXCAN-fails-to-probe-i-mx6sx/m-p/1175884#M164309</guid>
      <dc:creator>igorpadykov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-30T11:14:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

